The Democrats opinion is that Trump was looking to get dirt on Biden
The fact is that Trump wanted an investigation in 2016 / Biden
The Republicans opinion is that Trump wanted to root out corruption
Which can you prove? Doesn't prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt
The fact is that Trump wanted an investigation in 2016 / Biden
The Republicans opinion is that Trump wanted to root out corruption
Which can you prove? Doesn't prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt
Is the Democrat opinion and interpretation of events enough to convict Trump?
I don't think so as there is reason to believe the real issue is Ukraine proving they had changed
It doesnt mean its true, it just means you can prove any of it beyond wanting an investigation
I don't think so as there is reason to believe the real issue is Ukraine proving they had changed
It doesnt mean its true, it just means you can prove any of it beyond wanting an investigation
Quid Pro Quo is fine and normal if its used to weed out corruption
Thats exactly what Biden did in fact
So they need to prove Trump wanted dirt and they aren't even trying to do that
Thats exactly what Biden did in fact
So they need to prove Trump wanted dirt and they aren't even trying to do that
Democrats are trying to prove quid pro quo in general
They need to focus on Trump's motives and they need to find hard proof.
Sondland repeatedly saying "Burisma not Biden"
They need to focus on Trump's motives and they need to find hard proof.
Sondland repeatedly saying "Burisma not Biden"
