, 9 tweets, 3 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
A LONG Thread...
I have decided to reactivate my Twitter account for a very brief period in order to express my views on the RCOG Review process. I fully support Lorraine Walsh’s decision to step down from the Cervical Check steering committee 1/9
I share Lorraine’s concerns about the RCOG review process. I would like to state, for the record, that I do not have confidence in the RCOG review process. The RCOG Review was established to examine the individual histories of women who had been through the CervicalCheck...2/9
screening system & who had developed cervical cancer and to determine, in cases where results were discordant, what was the impact on treatment, prognosis and outcome. It is notable that the focus yesterday by Government was on RCOG’s endorsement of the screening programme...3/9
RATHER than on the impact of the findings for those women & families, which was ACTUALLY the purpose of the Review. Lorraine bravely outlined her experience on @RTE_PrimeTime. To reiterate: Lorraine’s experience of the RCOG Review was, as follows 4/9
Lorraine was first told that her slides could not be traced, she was then given a set of results even though her slides supposedly didn’t exist and 24 hours later was presented with a new report with entirely different results. On further investigation, she found that...5/9
labelling had been removed from both her slides and mine and our slides were subsequently mislabelled. These events do NOT instil confidence in the RCOG process. Lorraine stood down from the CervicalCheck Steering Committee accordingly, a decision I wholeheartedly agree with 6/9
Lorraine's decision was based on an unwavering commitment to the women and families of the @221plus group, a group that Lorraine helped found and which she has dedicated the past 12 months of her life helping women and families caught up in this debacle 7/9
Lorraine has requested that each woman be given the option of getting individual independent reviews of their smear screening, cytological and clinical history. This is the only way to conclusively give peace of mind to the women and families affected 8/9
This is an essential step to ensure that lingering concerns about past failures in CervicalCheck do NOT undermine future confidence in the screening programme, a programme we both want to restore trust in. @LorcallWalsh @Stephenteap @GabrielScally @roinnslainte @SimonHarrisTD
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Vicky Phelan

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!