Both facts and circumstantial evidence support the latter.
I think what you're trying to say is that no direct evidence supports the latter.
Most criminal cases are decided with circumstantial evidence, because criminals rarely sign confessions or get caught on camera.
I think what you're trying to say is that no direct evidence supports the latter.
Most criminal cases are decided with circumstantial evidence, because criminals rarely sign confessions or get caught on camera.
The law doesn’t distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence. Both are admissible and can be used to prove wrongdoing.
If you'd like a roundup of the evidence, click here: impeachment-trump.com
If you'd like a roundup of the evidence, click here: impeachment-trump.com
The only way to get to this conclusion is to ignore most of the evidence.
Click on my roundup of the testimony and start reading.
(Testimony is evidence)
Click on my roundup of the testimony and start reading.
(Testimony is evidence)
