Today the Mail on Sunday publishes the ruling on its lies about #LandForTheMany.
But @IpsoNews has allowed this ruling to lose its force:
1. It's been 6 MONTHS since the lies were published
2. It's AFTER the election
3. The paper could choose its own, very boring headline.
But @IpsoNews has allowed this ruling to lose its force:
1. It's been 6 MONTHS since the lies were published
2. It's AFTER the election
3. The paper could choose its own, very boring headline.
@IpsoNews It took the dogged, determined effort of @darkgreener (Anna Powell-Smith), who has a brilliant, forensic mind, even to get this far. I appreciate @IpsoNews's apology, but it's clear to me that the organisation is not fit for pupose. theguardian.com/media/2019/dec…
@IpsoNews @darkgreener It was because of these unconscionable delays, as the Mail on Sunday used every possible device to impede a resolution, pushing it past the election date, that I found myself breaking an embargo for the first time in my career this month: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
@IpsoNews @darkgreener The Mail's lies were immensely consequential, repeated by the Prime Minister, other senior Conservatives, and the rest of the billionaire press.
And, basically, it got away with them.
It seems to me that @IpsoNews has been set up to create an *impression* of action.
And, basically, it got away with them.
It seems to me that @IpsoNews has been set up to create an *impression* of action.
