, 3 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Lots of nuance and (self-interested) spook-filled turf protecting in this article. But the part on the DOJ not trusting ICIG Atkinson is a good sign.

Michael Atkinson is Very Dirty. Compromised by his coup-crew role at DOJ-NSD. Lawyer for Carlin then McCord then Boente.
John Sipher, quoted in the article (for obvious reasons) was a dirty, politically motivate, lower level intelligence analyst during his tenure at the agency.

@NatashaBertrand, author of the article, is the well known stenographer for Fusion-GPS operations.
@NatashaBertrand Anyone the SSCI willingly confirmed into the intelligence roles should be considered compromised.

It really is that simple.

If the Warner/Burr SSCI confirmed them, it's best to consider them dirty.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with TheLastRefuge

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!