#MatricResults2019
The department of basic education massages the numbers to tell a misleading rosy story every January.
Data out of the technical reports they release during the years. They paint a very troubling picture.
The real pass rate is 22% for Maths. Using 50% line
The department of basic education massages the numbers to tell a misleading rosy story every January.
Data out of the technical reports they release during the years. They paint a very troubling picture.
The real pass rate is 22% for Maths. Using 50% line
The data for Physical Science is not very positive either.
The real pass mark reveals an average performance of 25.2% of students passing over a period of 8 years.
The number is students sitting for the exam declined while the number sitting for matric went up.
The real pass mark reveals an average performance of 25.2% of students passing over a period of 8 years.
The number is students sitting for the exam declined while the number sitting for matric went up.
The Department has a strategic planing document outlining what their goals would be.
They have failed to meet the goals of their 2011-2014 Strategic Plan. Let alone the 2015-2018 plan.
If we were giving them a mark based on their Strat Plan. They would get 29%. They failed.
They have failed to meet the goals of their 2011-2014 Strategic Plan. Let alone the 2015-2018 plan.
If we were giving them a mark based on their Strat Plan. They would get 29%. They failed.
Never forget that while the data is nuetral - The statistics are political
Stats can be made to say whatever the person paying wants them to.
Misleading statistics are a reality.
Measuring a pass at 30% or 40% is a 🚩 for being hustled by the presenter of the data.
Stats can be made to say whatever the person paying wants them to.
Misleading statistics are a reality.
Measuring a pass at 30% or 40% is a 🚩 for being hustled by the presenter of the data.
