They have a point.
Alex Jones was banned and deplatformed. Even he didn't push such dangerous conspiracies as Rachel Maddow, and others.
She's not only NOT banned. But she's encouraged by a network gone completely mad.
At least he apologized. She and others refuse to do so.
Alex Jones was banned and deplatformed. Even he didn't push such dangerous conspiracies as Rachel Maddow, and others.
She's not only NOT banned. But she's encouraged by a network gone completely mad.
At least he apologized. She and others refuse to do so.
Which conspiracy was more dangerous, meaning it had more repercussions to individuals, families and society:
Alex Jones and Sandy Hook, or Rachel Maddow lying to her audience for years about the president being a Russian traitor?
I'd argue NYT pushed more dangerous lies.
Alex Jones and Sandy Hook, or Rachel Maddow lying to her audience for years about the president being a Russian traitor?
I'd argue NYT pushed more dangerous lies.
Don't see it? Okay.
Which falsehood (lie) was more dangerous, meaning it had more repercussions to individuals, families and society:
Alex Jones and Sandy Hook, or the NY Times pushing Iraq had weapons of mass destruction?
Whole new perspective, right? I can do more.
Which falsehood (lie) was more dangerous, meaning it had more repercussions to individuals, families and society:
Alex Jones and Sandy Hook, or the NY Times pushing Iraq had weapons of mass destruction?
Whole new perspective, right? I can do more.
I only lament on Sandy Hook because that is the story big media and big tech used to serve their political masters' wishes to de-person Alex Jones off the Internet.
