My Authors
Read all threads
So remember those 3% of climate papers that disagree and say anthropogenic (people caused) warming isn't a thing, and isn't a problem? Well, turns out they're (shockingly) not replicable, and don't even agree with each other. link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Here's an explanation/summary if you don't want to read the actual paper: qz.com/1069298/the-3-…
Short version: Bad models (like doesn't replicate basic physics), over curve fitting (too many fit iterations or iterative outlier removal, bad data selection (ignoring records or context).
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with ScienceVet

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!