Thread by @Farrier105

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway The Democrats do not need to run for cover from the FISA story as the MSM just downplays it or refuses to cover it in any depth. This is being done for SOME reason. I doubt it is the one we are being told. It rarely is. The REAL stories are more interesting. Let me show you.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Let's drill down on the DNC hack stories. In actuality, there were two alleged hacks by Russians. One in 2015 and the other in early 2016. The REAL stories are much more interesting.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway The 2015 hack is the one that holds the most water. The NSA told the FBI that the hack was underway in the summer of 2015. This was the COZY BEAR hack, as "Cozy Bear" was the nickname Crowdstrike gave the Russian group allegedly responsible for the hack. That group, called...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...an "ADVANCED PERSISTENT THREAT (APT) allegedly penetrated the DNC network in July 2015. An APT is a hacking group, the people and malware used for the hacking. This APT is associated with the Russian FSB, the civilian intelligence service.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway What did the FBI do about this hack? Keep in mind, Democrat office holders have access to the DNC network, and some of those office holders have access to classified information, including SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (SCI) only available from inside a secure...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...SENSITIVE COMPARTMENT INFORMATION FACILITY (SCIF). Well, the FBI didn't do much. Despite having access to NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS (NSL) to force their way onto the DNC network, JAMES COMEY took the approach of requesting access, but doing nothing when the DNC rejected...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...Comey's requests. The FBI had previously used NSLs thousands of times as they do not require judicial approval. All the FBI did was telephone the DNC and warn them that COZY BEAR was on their network, and even transmitted data to Moscow in November 2015.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway What might have been stolen by COZY BEAR? Well, the MSM has discussed some of it, both in the past and recently, but the reports are muted. This has to do with one document in particular.

realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/…

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Yes, Comey claims the letter is a forgery, but someone needs to explain why a forgery is now classified as SCI. Whether it is or in not a forgery, COZY BEAR was able to prance around inside the DNC network for nearly an entire year and no one the DNC hired to find them ever did.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Comey's decision was what enabled SOMETHING to get transmitted to Moscow in 2015 directly from the DNC network. We don't know what comprised that data provided all that we have been told about a Russian hack of the DNC is true.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway So, the first hack's actual story is much more interesting. The second even more so, using a DNC executive as a source for the more interesting questions about it. This is the infamous FANCY BEAR hack, Fancy Bear being Crowdstrike's nickname for the GRU (Russian military intel)

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway APT allegedly responsible for the theft of the DNC emails that were transferred to Wikileaks as allegedly part of a Russian plot to elect Donald Trump President.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Keep in mind that any such operation by any foreign intelligence agency to elect someone President must be a COVERT operation. No one can find out, that early in a Presidential campaign, that Russian intelligence is assisting Trump's election. It should go without...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...saying that, if such an operation was "blown" while it was underway, that the plot to elect Trump would be destroyed once the American public was informed of all the pertinent details of the plot. In that case, Peter Strzok would be right. No one would vote for Trump at all.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway FANCY BEAR blew their operation almost IMMEDIATELY. Where the FSB's Cozy Bear only seemed to forget that THE NSA EXISTED AT ALL, Fancy Bear operated as if the operation was DESIGNED TO BE DETECTED. Remember, the DNC people, and their security consultants, could not even...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...find Cozy Bear's malware on the network, nor could they find a trace of them on the system audit and event logs. DNC IT employees found FANCY BEAR in record time, in a few weeks, and Crowdstrike was hired to deal with the breach in a few days of the discovery, 4/29/2016.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Crowdstrike started on the DNC network on 5/5/2016, and found that the hackers were RUSSIANS by 5/6/2016. Here is where it gets interesting. According to DONNA BRAZILE's book, HACKS, Crowdstrike wanted to disconnect the network from the Internet, and change out the computers..

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...right away. According to Brazile, "the DNC" told Crowdstrike NOT TO disconnect from the network until after all the primaries were over. The result was the alleged hackers had 36 days to romp around the DNC network and steal whatever they wanted, even though the hackers...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway ...were part of a RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE APT--allegedly. The DNC employees were not told Russians were watching what they were doing. The result was all the damaging emails were produced WHILE CROWDSTRIKE WAS THERE, especially the emails about OLD MAN SANDERS getting the shaft.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Now, we know the DNC execs and Crowdstrike knew Fancy Bear was in the network, but did the alleged Russian spies know Crowdstrike was watching them? According to Mueller's report and the indictment of the alleged Russian hackers, they knew "on or before 5/31/2016."

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway The Russians knew their alleged plot was blown by 5/31/2016. What did they do about it? They kept it going. Not only did the alleged Russian hackers stay on the network into June, but got back in during JULY, after Crowdstrike supposedly removed them.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway No wonder Donna Brazile described Fancy Bear as being rather LOUD for covert operators. In fact, the data stolen by the alleged Russian hackers was bigger than the 5/23/2016 and 5/25/2016 downloads of the DNC emails. The thing was huge--GIGABYTES---probably everything there.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway This should give you an idea of all that was stolen--allegedly--by Russian hackers:

theforensicator.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/pea…

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Now, try to understand just why the Crowdstrike and DNC executives told Ellen Nakashima of WAPO that only two files of opposition research about Trump was stolen during an exclusive 6/13/2016 interview after Crowdstrike thought the alleged Russian hackers were expelled...

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway from the DNC network? Wouldn't they have known about the 5/23 and 5/25 thefts of the emails? Wouldn't they know about thefts of the donor information? The DNC executives told Nakashima the donor information was not even so much as ACCESSED by the alleged Russian hackers.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway Emails were only "read or monitored" by Cozy Bear, but not a word about their theft by Fancy Bear. Two things kept this story from getting media saturation, and that was important to muting these anomalies and contradictions from detection later. The media did not care about..

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway this hack, even if the Russians did it, for two reasons:

1. During the weekend Crowdstrike and the DNC met with Nakashima was the weekend of the ORLANDO PULSE SHOOTING EVENT.

2. The story told by Crowdstrike and the DNC was one of a NOTHING HACK that resulted in no catastrophic

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway data loss by the DNC. The alleged Russian hackers were only after information about how Trump would operate as a politician and not a businessman. It was a NOTHING hack. The NY TIMES didn't report it for 48 hours. What happened to change the hack story into an "act of War"

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway by Russia?

Guccifer 2.0 showed up the day after Nakashima's story. Guccifer 2.0 bragged he stole the emails and gave them to Wikileaks.

That is all that happened between the 6/14/2016 publication of the Nakashima article and the revised description of the alleged hack.

@angiekaye999 @MZHemingway And that is all that you haven't been told in one place.

And it's a lot.