Woke up a bit ago to some angry texts from Rudy Giuliani.
He's pissed Dems aren't considering calling him as a witness and says "they are afraid of my physical presence."
"Why do they want Bolton if not me," he says. "Again I really should stop wasting my time." #impeachment
He's pissed Dems aren't considering calling him as a witness and says "they are afraid of my physical presence."
"Why do they want Bolton if not me," he says. "Again I really should stop wasting my time." #impeachment
Asked why House Dems only subpoenaed Giuliani for records and not testimony, an Intel Committee official said “documents are necessary to test the credibility of any witness, but especially one like Giuliani."
via @NYDailyNews
nydailynews.com/news/politics/…
via @NYDailyNews
nydailynews.com/news/politics/…
@NYDailyNews Giuliani threw some Latin legalese at me when I asked why he didn't comply with the Sept. 30 records subpoena.
“If they wanted to subpoena me they would have to serve a subpoena in personem not a subpoena ducus tecum. Do you understand? I’d be impressed?”
nydailynews.com/news/politics/…
“If they wanted to subpoena me they would have to serve a subpoena in personem not a subpoena ducus tecum. Do you understand? I’d be impressed?”
nydailynews.com/news/politics/…
@NYDailyNews It has now also come to my understanding that Giuliani misspelled both of those Latin terms.
It's supposed to be "in personam," not "in personem."
It's also supposed to be "duces tecum," not "ducus tecum."
It's supposed to be "in personam," not "in personem."
It's also supposed to be "duces tecum," not "ducus tecum."
