This is a very bad look for ACRONYM — the Democratic super PAC that launched Shadow.
That super PAC is very popular in...Silicon Valley.
That super PAC is very popular in...Silicon Valley.
More on Shadow from @Robillard and co.
Would not want to be on donor calls tomorrow!
huffpost.com/entry/iowa-cau…
Would not want to be on donor calls tomorrow!
huffpost.com/entry/iowa-cau…
@Robillard Just in — a statement from ACRONYM.
"We, like everyone else, are eagerly awaiting more information from the Iowa Democratic Party."
"We, like everyone else, are eagerly awaiting more information from the Iowa Democratic Party."
@Robillard ACRONYM also clarifies that it does not wholly own Shadow, saying that Shadow has "other private investors."
But ACRONYM has previously said that it is "launching" Shadow — so the ties between these two organizations are obviously close.
But ACRONYM has previously said that it is "launching" Shadow — so the ties between these two organizations are obviously close.
@Robillard Also —
The number of Democratic strategists taking some schadenfreude in ACRONYM's struggles tonight is...not small.
The number of Democratic strategists taking some schadenfreude in ACRONYM's struggles tonight is...not small.
Here is Shadow saying in July that it was an “acquisition” by ACRONYM (h/t @nycsouthpaw.)
But now ACRONYM is saying that it is merely an “investor” in Shadow.
Did something change between July and now?
But now ACRONYM is saying that it is merely an “investor” in Shadow.
Did something change between July and now?
