Surely there must come a point at which "causing unnecessary panic" becomes a crime? What defence can there be for articles like this one in the Express, about an asteroid that will never come nearer than 5.4 million km from Earth? This is Orson Welles "War of the Worlds" level. 
Here's another example, from earlier today.
Quite literally the only instance of "panic" being mentioned is in the headline. Nothing in the article backs up the use of the word.
But of course, the kind of people who allow the Express to dictate their worldview will now panic!
Quite literally the only instance of "panic" being mentioned is in the headline. Nothing in the article backs up the use of the word.
But of course, the kind of people who allow the Express to dictate their worldview will now panic!
One more example, because nobody can stand to paddle in the cesspool that is the Express for very long.
Headline: causes panic about an ice age coming "soon".
Body text: refutes the headline, and says actually because of global warming an ice age is thousands of years away.
Headline: causes panic about an ice age coming "soon".
Body text: refutes the headline, and says actually because of global warming an ice age is thousands of years away.
NOTE: Those 3 examples come from the last 48 hours, and they're a sample not a comprehensive list.
Imagine being exposed to years of this manure. Literal brain rot!
Imagine being exposed to years of this manure. Literal brain rot!
