This @businessinsider Article is humiliatingly inaccurate.
Let me count the falsehoods and lazy misrepresentations in this article:
1. It says no one knows where the video came from. Nonsense. My team at @TPUSA made the video in question. There’s a watermark on the video
Let me count the falsehoods and lazy misrepresentations in this article:
1. It says no one knows where the video came from. Nonsense. My team at @TPUSA made the video in question. There’s a watermark on the video
2. The article makes it seem as though the aim of the video was to deceive people into thinking Pelosi ripped the speech after one of the stories. The same clip is repeated several times throughout the video and was clearly edited in a way to convey a message, not to mislead.
3. It claims the video is “doctored”. Nothing about the video itself altered. These were clips of real events that happened in a different sequence, similar to any regular news segment or sports highlight reel. Are those “doctored” too?
4. It tries to compare this video to a different edited video of Speaker Pelosi where her voice is slowed down to make her seem drunk. This is in no way similar to the video my team made.
