The left is insane.
Very literally, very deeply insane.
Talk of male or female bodies is inaccurate and dangerous. slate.com/human-interest…
Very literally, very deeply insane.
Talk of male or female bodies is inaccurate and dangerous. slate.com/human-interest…
"Most insidious, we use the same language that opponents of transgender people use, carelessly referring to women who are trans as having “male genitals” or being “born with a male body” or being “anatomically male.” This language is both factually wrong and dangerous."
"At birth, we classify infants as male or female based solely on the appearance of their external genitalia. Notably, this classification serves population control and surveillance and not medical purposes."
"The medical experts I have spoken with could not identify a single medical purpose for assigning sex at birth and explain that the components of sex are far more complex..."
"By embracing a narrative that one is born with a “male body,” we reinforce the idea that only the bodies we assign male at birth— bodies that have medically normative penises— are male."
"But that simply isn’t true. It is a choice to refer to some bodies as male and some bodies as female, not a fact. Our genital characteristics are one component of who we are and do not define, medically or biologically, our sex."
"For me, the answer is clear: I want to advocate for a world where our bodies are not sexed by the presence or absence of a penis."
"I was assigned female at birth, but I have never had a female body."
The author is a transgender man, born female. Who is clearly *desperate* for public validation that he is in fact male, to the point of declaring the identification of male bodies 'dangerous.'
Of course, if sex is not defined by sex characteristics, why did he transition?
Of course, if sex is not defined by sex characteristics, why did he transition?
