This is because his assumptions are wrong, his ideas sometimes echo narratives of the far-right & he says things that are just plainly untrue
Thread.
thetimes.co.uk/article/taj-ha…
Just because he does believe meat needs to be Halal, shouldn't result in such statements
Perhaps he needs to meet Heraa Hashmi who put together a "712-page Google doc that proves Muslims do condemn terrorism" (theguardian.com/world/shortcut…)
dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…
dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…
Hargey's position: Johnson "did not go far enough".
thetimes.co.uk/edition/commen…
thetimes.co.uk/article/taj-ha…
thetimes.co.uk/article/taj-ha…
"Absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt. But we need to make sure our mosques don’t become a hotbed for MI5 and MI6 infiltration..."
'It is the extremist ideology present in many UK mosques which is the cement behind nihilistic plots such as this,' he says. 'They are twisting Islam.'
dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…
E.g. see front page of The Times
(Other outlets using similar terms:
thesun.co.uk/news/6975160/l… &
standard.co.uk/news/politics/…)
This was necessary but I believe insufficient given the importance of challenging controversial claims on-the-spot, & the inability to tackle the numerous false statements