1) The dutch painter Rembrandt is well know for exposing conspiracies in his paintings. Peter Greenaway's well done documentary "J'accuse" is a explaining part by part the conspiracies behind the famous painting "The Night Watch".
2) In my hometome at #HAUM is his "Family Portrait". This painting shows a "happy family searching for flowers in the garden at night". But is it really? I don't think so. 
3) The theory I present is a kind of conspiracy theory. In fact I'm the only person believing in it, so there's a high possibility that I'm wrong.
4) Everybody agrees: Nothing is known about the family in the portrait. Nothing. And nobody knows who paid for this painting.
Looking at it, there was something disturbing in it ...
Looking at it, there was something disturbing in it ...
5) I don't know any "happy family looking for flowers in the garden at night." And looking at the family, they don't really seem to be happy. Is this a happy girl? Or is she crying? Did Rembrandt forget how to paint 'happy girls'?
6) And there's more of it. Looks at the directions of the lights! Think of pictures from the moon! Rembrandt used the technique of 'theatrical lights' to tell two stories in one painting...
7) Dividing the painting in two parts it's easier to see...
8) So now the most interesting question. Who is the boy? Rembrandt often painted himself in his paintings like in the "Night Watch". Could it be, that he is the boy? How could he show it as an old know? Who would recognize him?
9) To make it short: He painted a self portrait at the same time he painted the so called "family portrait" in which he looks exactly like the young boy. Too many coincidences. Decide for yourself!
10) And for stupid people like me he made it very obvious. The boy has a brush in his hand pointing to the signature "Rembrandt".
11) So let's assume: The boy is #Rembrandt. What do we see in scene A? A woman is pushing the artist into scene B. And what is happening in scene B? What's really happening?
12) Look again! What do you see? A dark looking man and two young girls collecting flowers at night in the garden. OK, the older girl, who collected 'flowers' before, doesn't look happy, but perhaps it's just the ordinary 'happy family' we want to see...
12) But there's an elephant in the room, in this case: the flower. Does it really look like a flower? Do you know any 'flower' like this? Where does he hold it? Does anybody (except of Joe Biden) would present a flower like this to a young girl? A fleshy penis-colored flower?
13) How do the girls interact? What does the older girl know about the 'flower'? Why is the older girl not looking into the eyes of the younger? What is between them? Did #Rembrandt forgot how to paint flowers? Is this the way you would like to portrait your family?
13) Now there are two possibilities: Either I'm wrong, and this is really a 'happy family', the old #Rembrandt was retarded, lost all his political ambitions and started to paint for money ...
14) Or Rembrandt was far ahead of his time and exposed, what nobody wanted to see. And he knew: We wouldn't see, because everybody likes to see a 'happy family'. Pedophilia was placed directly in front of our eyes, like corruption is directly in front of us and most can't see.
unroll @threadreaderapp
