Part of my research is about the ways in which political ideology shapes how people process data.
This, where Coulter presents data that show the exact opposite of what she claims, is the most amazing thing I've ever seen.
This, where Coulter presents data that show the exact opposite of what she claims, is the most amazing thing I've ever seen.
Me, an idiot: We spent two years coming up with a clever experimental design to get at the subtle ways motivated reasoning affects numerical judgments.
Ann Coulter, bestselling author: THE NUMBERS MEAN THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY SAY.
watermark.silverchair.com/muy001.pdf?tok…
Ann Coulter, bestselling author: THE NUMBERS MEAN THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY SAY.
watermark.silverchair.com/muy001.pdf?tok…
Many people are RTing or liking clearly erroneous data. In work w Poul Nielsen, we point out that how people process data depends upon sources. We give credence to sources we trust, meaning we may not bother to look closely at the data they provide.
academic.oup.com/jpart/article-…
academic.oup.com/jpart/article-…
Oooff - bad link. Here is the link to the paper academic.oup.com/jpart/article/…
Since the original tweet took off, big shout out to my co-authors (i.e. the people who did the real work) on these @jpart1991 papers I cited: @julianhupka @poul_a_nielsen @Niels_Bjorn @CasperDahlmann
academic.oup.com/jpart/article/…
academic.oup.com/jpart/article-…
academic.oup.com/jpart/article/…
academic.oup.com/jpart/article-…
