It is an important case to follow for any #schools & #teachers working with Stonewall. The CPS ‘hate crimes’ schools pack, produced in conjunction with #Stonewall has now been permanently withdrawn, but the judicial review of the relationship between CPS...
and Stonewall did not go ahead. Stonewall’s relationship with and influence on public bodies still needs to be tested in the courts. @BluskyeAllison’s case will do this.
Stonewall started with the laudable aim of ensuring equal rights for lesbian, gay & bisexual people. They used to do good work in schools challenging homophobic bullying & the use of ‘that’s so gay’ as a slur. Sadly they have now morphed into a highly political...
organisation, pushing contentious viewpoints and campaigning for controversial law changes. As such they are unsuitable for use in schools. More from @Transgendertrd here:
Yesterday we heard from Ben Cooper QC for the claimant (@BluskyeAllison) and today we should hear from Robin Moira White & Mr Johnston for the defendants (@gardencourtlaw & @stonewalluk ). We are hoping to start at 9.30 with Robin Moira White.
Mr Johnston: allegations from claimant are ‘fundamentally objectionable’. Denying that claimant unable to name individuals. Allegations tar all members of GCC.
Mr Johnston: It is ‘inherently problematic’ that claimant has failed to identify individuals. In order for organisation to be liable under section 57. Individuals still need to be identified.
Mr Johnston: emails discussing what was to be posted to GCC website bear no resemblance to what was actually posted. The ‘strident’ language of the emails was not used.
Judge Stout: Do WhatsApp messages shown to me by Ben Cooper not contradict Michelle Brewers claim she’d not been in contact with people from Stonewall.
Mr Johnston: It is not remotely likely that claimant will be able to identify any individual acting on authority from GCC who has discriminated against her
Mr Johnston: leaving aside lack of identification of individuals, PCPs are ‘inherently problematic’. No proof respondents treated gender critical beliefs as ‘bigoted’.
Mr Johnston: admits once complaint from Stonewall was received this did become the focus. Only two points of complaint were upheld by joint heads of chambers
Mr Johnston: expulsion of claimant was never remotely considered. Claimant was requested to remove two tweets, she didn’t do so. No further action was taken.
RMW: Mr Cooper said yesterday that discovery isn’t complete. It is as far as we’re concerned. I’m here to represent stonewall, they’ve given the disclosure they feel proper
RMW: both organisations GCC & stonewall are ‘diversity forward’. I’ve got 25 years of practice, the protected characteristics have grown. The PC giving society trouble at the moment is ‘trans’
Judge Stout: the essence of Stonewall complaint is the claimants tweets including allegations of Stonewall’s appalling levels of intimidation. Is that not inducement to a detriment?
Mr Cooper: the claimant knew about the email at the bottom of thread but not the one at the top. We should not be getting into this level of detail in a hearing of this kind.
Mr Cooper: there’s no doubt that the tweet out was to distance GCC from the complainant. For ever more when anybody Google’s @BluskyeAllison barrister, they will get that she was investigated by her chambers.
Mr Cooper: Ms White’s position appears to be that stonewall is so lacking in influence that it can’t be liable. This is not about influence it is about discrimination.
Mr Cooper: Ms White is wrong to say that it is not an instruction if someone says to you, you do this or we will do something unpleasant. Indeed it is more than an instruction, it is a threat.
Judge Stout: essence of legal case, claimant made clear she objected to GCC association with Stonewall & then helped launch @ALLIANCELGB resulting in stonewall complaining to GCC and claimant suffering detriment.
Judge Stout: there is no evidence that heads of chambers deemed claimants views bigoted and not worthy of respect, there is evidence that Michelle Brewer and others thought this. Were they acting as agents of GCC
RMW: trying to arrange a meeting for next week to deal with disclosures. We need to ask each other proportionately for disclosure. Final date for hearing in June.
Mr Cooper: neither I nor Mr Johnston have firm instructions on disclosure at the moment. We need to try and thrash it out. There will be information on GCC servers.
Judge Stout: is there anything else Mr Johnston or Ms White thought should go on a further list of particulars? Which individuals are alleged to have colluded?
RMW: We need to know which witnesses to call. This is an important case for all involved, with consequences for all involved, the timetable is too tight.
RMW complaining about volume of paper’s received from complainant. This isn’t co-operation. This has cost us £600. My solicitors are Scottish (difference in terminology)
Mr Cooper firmly stating that approach of GCC & Stonewall has NOT been co-operative. Characterising some of their previous suggestions as ‘ridiculous’.
Hearing has ended. We would like to thank Judge Stout for her thorough, fair and good natured approach to this case . Total respect on passing judgement with small children (3+?) in the background!
Ben Cooper trying to establish communications between individuals at Stonewall & individuals at Garden Court Chambers. Arguing names of individuals is relevant and they put in public domain.
The @CareQualityComm inspection report which found @TaviAndPort#GIDS service to be ‘inadequate’ is a truly shocking read. We are appalled at the spin that this is just about waiting times. It is not. This is a #safeguarding scandal. Full report here:
Questions must be asked (and answered) about why so many children were experiencing distress around gender in the first place. What has gone wrong in our society? Why are we failing to challenge gender stereotypes? What are children looking at online?
The regulatory capture in our society has gone so far that even the @CareQualityComm report into this scandal uses highly contested, ideological language such as ‘assigned sex at birth’. This must stop. Sex is observed at birth, usually by medical professionals.
THREAD
We have been sent these screenshots from a Facebook group of teachers unofficially affiliated with a major union.
We are disturbed to see this misinformation and lack of understanding of safeguarding being circulated.
We agree that it is important for school staff to be mindful of any trans-identified student in their care, suffering from mental distress (or any students experiencing mental distress for whatever reason).
We understand that the #KeiraBell case will have caused distress to some, especially given the dangerous narrative being irresponsibly pushed that this will make children suicidal and was an attack on their rights, not an action to safeguard and protect them.
Safe Schools Alliance believe that school should be a safe environment for children to learn to discuss difficult issues respectfully, allowing for differences of opinion.
There will be serious knock-on effects for the rest of society if children are not given the opportunity to have open, honest and respectful discussions, and to be able to ‘agree to disagree’ with others.
Children should not be criminalised unless absolutely necessary; robust school policies that place safeguarding at their core, and acknowledge that children may need guidance in learning these skills, are best placed to deal with ‘non-crime hate incidents’. #edutwitter
From today’s judgement in the #KeiraBell case: “The third Intervener is @Transgendertrd, an organisation that provides evidence- based information & resources for parents & schools concerning children with GD. @cwknews is the director of that organisation...
she has filed a witness statement in these proceedings.
She set out concerns about the lack of evidence as to the impacts & effectiveness of PBs & in relation to which patients it is most likely to help. Much of her evidence focused on the increase of referrals to GIDS of...
teenage natal girls & the cultural factors, including material on the internet & social media, which may play a part in this. She said that GIDS does not offer young people with GD a range of ways to interpret their experience, & the GIDS pathway offers a minimal challenge to...