Inclusion & inclusive language: Balancing the rights of all.
This morning we have seen a lot of confusion in the education community regarding sex & gender, when children should & shouldn’t be separated by sex & ‘inclusive’ language.
‘People who menstruate’ is not ‘inclusive’ language. It is offensive & dehumanising. When used in public health campaigns it excludes many women. Women with LD’s, women with EAL, women with poor literacy skills. The @educationgovuk is clear that it is girls who menstruate.
As well as being offensive (it is akin to the old fashioned misogynistic slur ‘bleeders’) ‘people who menstrate’, ‘cervix havers’, ‘uterus owners’ & all the other appalling euphemisms used for women & girls. It is politically motivated language & as such has no place in school.
Language like this is being pushed by political lobby groups. Proselytising about a particular political ideology in schools is illegal under the 1996 education act. This could not have been re-iterated more clearly by latest @educationgovuk guidance.
Whilst @educationgovuk guidance is clear that “teachers should always seek to treat individual students with sympathy & support.” Gender identity ideology is a political belief system that should not be imposed on all pupils. ‘Gender identity’ is not a protected characteristic.
Girls & boys should both learn in biology about the physical changes both sexes will go through. This does not mean that single sex groups should never be used. They are helpful for reasons of privacy & dignity & facilitating discussion. @MenAtWork_MC menatworkcic.org/2021/03/21/10-…
Schools also need to be mindful of the cultural needs of their particular communities. Before changing single sex to mixed sex they should consult with parents & carry out equality impact assessments. Once again inclusion of males could mean exclusion of females.
There are nine protected characteristics, Age, Disability, Gender Reassignment, marriage & civil partnership, maternity & pregnancy, Race, Religion & belief, Sex, & sexual orientation all are equal in law & all most be considered in equality impact assessments.
Most of all, teachers & school leaders must remember their #safeguarding training at all times. Nothing trumps safeguarding, including inclusion, equality & diversity’. Obfuscating language is known to be a barrier to children making disclosures.
Failure to remember & apply #safeguarding training & consider the needs of all members of the school community, leads to horrifying situations such as this, where girls are erroneously told they have no right to male free spaces.
If schools are undermining #safeguarding, misrepresenting the law or using politically motivated or incorrect language, parents should follow this procedure.
END
THREAD
Please keep signing & sharing this petition. The response from @NSPCC & @peterwanless has been unacceptable. This video must be withdrawn & lessons learnt about #safeguarding.
This is the latest response we have received from @NSPCC ‘supporter care’ (@peterwanless didn’t have the courtesy to reply himself). This is unacceptable. If Childline are no longer endorsing this video, they need to say why. All other unsuitable material must also be withdrawn
This video is still up on YouTube, stating that it was made in conjunction with Childline. If the @NSPCC no longer endorse this video they need to say so & ensure its removal. It has been viewed 3m+ times & is still being promoted by @ScotGovEdurshp.scot/wp-content/upl……
“The awards cut across every aspect of the operation of the school...advising teachers to “introduce yourself at the start of the year using your pronouns and encourage students to do the same.”
This is compelled speech. #Teachers contact your unions.
‘in her evidence to @Commonswomequ
earlier this week Stonewall CEO @Nancy_M_K claimed: “one of the things that’s really important to say is that we don’t advocate for the removal of the single sex exemptions.” ‘
THREAD
Yet more ‘historic’ child #safeguarding failures. But are these historic? Or are the same failings still happening today? Does everybody who has concerns always raise them? Or in another 20 yrs time will we be listening to excuses from people who..
have concerns RIGHT NOW but are failing to raise them? Are we learning our lessons? Are we listening? Or do we continue to vilify those who raise concerns? Do we as adults accept our responsibility to safeguard all children? Do we really understand the mantra ‘You never...
know anyone well enough to say they couldn’t, wouldn’t or didn’t’? Or do we continue to ignore our instincts, excuse friends, family, colleagues, pillars of the community, to the detriment of children? Do we fulfil our duty to #SpeakOut? Or do we continue to allow ourselves...
It is an important case to follow for any #schools & #teachers working with Stonewall. The CPS ‘hate crimes’ schools pack, produced in conjunction with #Stonewall has now been permanently withdrawn, but the judicial review of the relationship between CPS...
Ben Cooper trying to establish communications between individuals at Stonewall & individuals at Garden Court Chambers. Arguing names of individuals is relevant and they put in public domain.
The @CareQualityComm inspection report which found @TaviAndPort#GIDS service to be ‘inadequate’ is a truly shocking read. We are appalled at the spin that this is just about waiting times. It is not. This is a #safeguarding scandal. Full report here:
Questions must be asked (and answered) about why so many children were experiencing distress around gender in the first place. What has gone wrong in our society? Why are we failing to challenge gender stereotypes? What are children looking at online?
The regulatory capture in our society has gone so far that even the @CareQualityComm report into this scandal uses highly contested, ideological language such as ‘assigned sex at birth’. This must stop. Sex is observed at birth, usually by medical professionals.