Hello #twitterstorians! Sorry about the break for the last two days. There were...uh...technical difficulties...
But we're back! In this thread, I, @StevenMVose, want to give a brief #history of the #Delhi Sultanate and share some facts and recent scholarly takes that may complicate the #narrative of the Sultanate, and of #Islam in So. Asia, that I alluded to in the previous thread.
I will also highlight some #Jain interactions with the Sultans, which suggest a complex set of interactions between #Indian religious communities and the emerging #Islamicate "state" in the late 13th and early 14th c's. CE
The Delhi Sultanate was not a single polity but rather a series of five dynasties that ruled varying amounts of #India between 1206 and 1526 CE, reaching its height between 1326 and 1334, when Jinaprabhasūri was in Muhammad bin Tughluq's court.
But let's start by backing up a bit and taking stock of the advent of Islam and #Muslims in South Asia, and then think about the problematics of calling it "Islamic Rule."
Before any military engagements, Arab Muslim traders regularly traveled to India. The earliest mosque there is in #Kerala, claimed to have been built in 629 CE (three years before the Prophet Muhammad PBUH died).
At the dawn of the 8th c., India was ruled by numerous small kingdoms. Muslim traders In 711/2 CE, Muhammad bin Qasim, an Arab, led the conquest of #Sindh. This marks the first rule by a Muslim king in South Asia.
Muslim rulers of the region regarded the local Hindu population as "ahl al-dhimma." The Sun (Aditya) Temple in Multan, e.g., was allowed to carry on with worship and hosting pilgrims, dividing ⅓ of the revenue (keeping ⅔). Reversing course, Ismailis destroyed it in 986.
In the early 11th c., Mahmud of Ghazni, an Afghan, launched a series of plundering raids in India. However, he had no interest in ruling in India; he used the plunder to pay his armies for his westward aspirations.
Mahmud "famously" plundered the #Somnath Temple on the coast of peninsular Gujarat in 1024/5. #Persian sources claim that he carried the linga back to Ghazni. However, the wooden temple was restored quickly and a stone temple was constructed a century later (see photo).
In fact, no #Hindu sources note this sacking. Persian narratives suggest this event, along with his campaign against the Ismailis in Multan, helped Mahmud to gain an investiture from the #Abbasid Caliphate, which granted him the title of "Sultan" - the first to use it.
In his 1333 "Chapters on Various Pilgrimage Places" (VTK, Ch. 17), Jinaprabhasūri notes that in 1081 VS (1024/5 CE), "Gajjaṇa" attacked the temple.
The story of Mahmud's desecration came into Indian public consciousness in the 19th c., as #British colonialists deployed divide-and-rule tactics in the wake of the 1857 #SepoyRebellion, portraying it as evidence of Muslim antagonism against Hindus and #Hinduism.
Now for the main event. Between 1175 and 1192, another Afghan empire, the Ghurids, waged several campaigns against N. Indian kingdoms, finally defeating #Prithviraj Chauhan in 1192. Led by Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad, they established a permanent base in Delhi.
After Muhammad's assassination in 1206, his Mamluk (slave) General, Qutb al-Din Aybak declared independence from the Ghurids. This marks the beginning of the Delhi Sultanate.
Establishing their capital on the grounds of "King Prithviraj's Fort" (Qila Ra'i Pithora), one of their first tasks was to set up a Jama mosque. The Qubbat al-Islam (Dome of Islam) was built from parts taken, acc. to its inscription, from some 27 Hindu and Jain temples.
While temple parts were clearly used with faces effaced, expediency and conquest were likely the motivating factors. Quarrying new stone takes time; the same area of the temples was used for the mosque; and not all temples in the area were destroyed.
Until 1290, a series of Mamluk generals became sultans. They controlled much of N. India and the Ganges River.
In 1290, the Khaljis, a Turkish-Afghan family, ascended to power. Though short-lived, this dynasty would become the benchmark for future Sultans. Ala' al-Din (r. 1296-1316) launched a series of campaigns that greatly expanded the Sultanate, establishing a vast empire.
Although colonial and modern historians cast his conquest in religious terms and modern legend calls him "The Bloody" (Khuni), Ala' al-Din's army consisted of Hindu infantry (paiks) and disaffected Mongol generals.
They were also equal opportunity plunderers, taking equally, for example, from Hindu, Jain and Arab merchants in Cambay (modern Khambhat, Gujarat). This plunder and territory helped the Khaljis maintain a large army that fended off several #Mongol invasions.
The Khalji army launched campaigns in western India in 1298-1310, which brought many Jains into the Sultanate state. In 1313, a Jain temple at #Shatrunjay was plundered and the main image broken.
Several Jain sources note that the local governor, Alp Khan (d. 1316) worked with a Jain layman, #Samara Shah, to restore the temples and images in 1315.
Ala' al-Din employed Hindus and Jains to important positions. Thakkur Pherū, a Jain, held a high position in his mint, where he authored a number of #Apabhramsa works on #coin alloys ("billons"), #gemmology, and mathematics. He served the #Tughlag court, too. (See SR Sarma)
The Tughluqs succeeded the Khaljis in 1320. Muhammad (r. 1325-1351) expanded the empire to its greatest extent, holding more territory than any Indian empire since #Ashoka's Mauryan Empire (321-185 BCE).
I’ll be back in a few hours to talk more about the reign of Muhammad bin Tughluq. Preview: everything you know about him is wrong. Goodnight!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tuesday: Sotades the Obscene, inventor of palindromes, the Priapeia, sotadean metre and so much more. Also: the kinaidoi (effeminate dancers of Alexandria), Arsinoe the sex-positive proto-feminist queen, incestual royal marriage and sick burns. 2/7 -ms
Wednesday: later antique Greek palindromes from the oldest letter-by-letter verse (a school exercise in Tebtunis Egypt) through the Greek Anthology, Leo the Wise, Western Euopean baptismal fonts and Theodoros Prodromos. 3/7 -ms
Day 6 of palindromic #TwitterHistorian @taoish Mark Saltveit's stint. Yesterday, the SATOR / ROTAS square. Today, "versus recurrentes" = Latin palindromic poetry, mostly 1 line. At #IMC2021, I argued that it was a continuous & self-referential genre from 2nd-15th c. CE.
1/12 -ms
I listed 42 but documenting is tricky. These were rarely in main texts. Most appeared in margins or on fly leaves, but repeated over the centuries. Theory: these were transmitted by teachers, esp. of scribes, and passed via wax tablets, memory & pen tests (federproben).
2/12 -ms
The classic (and first known) Latin verse #palindrome is a dactylic pentameter: "Roma tibi subito motibus ibit amor." Sidonius Apollinaris (ep. 9.14, ~480 CE) called it ancient. It's on a roof tile from Aquincum dated 107 CE next to a ROTAS square & at Ostia (200 CE). 3/12 -ms
Day 4 of #TweetHistorian Mark Saltveit @taoish's look at #palindromes. Thursday we viewed palindromic forms in non-European languages, a sadly neglected topic. "Today": the SATOR / ROTAS square, attested 4x in the first c. CE: 3x at Pompeii, 1x at Conimbriga in Portugal. 1/12 -ms
It's the Hollywood celebrity of #palindromes, thx to Chris Nolan's film TENET. It starts at an OPERA. ROTAS is the time reversal machine. TENET is the name of the conspiracy. Andrei SATOR is the villain. Thomas AREPO is an art forger we never see. 2/12 -ms beyondwordplay.com/palindromes-at…
This square is an image, a graphic composed of letters, arguably the world's first and most successful meme. Calling it a Latin sentence (SATOR AREPO TENET OPERA ROTAS, or the reverse) is a hypothesis with v. little historical support. AREPO is not a Latin word or name. 3/12 -ms
Let's try to tie this all together. Yesterday, we looked at how the spread of monotheism to South Arabia impacted its political sphere. Today, let's take a look at South Arabia during the early Islamic period.
~ik
Yesterday I mentioned how the Ethiopian Aksumites invaded South Arabia and installed a local Christian ruler. Around 530 AD, it was followed by that of the Ethiopian general ʾAbraha.
However, ʾAbraha made sure to follow in the footsteps of his Himyaritic predecessors.
~ik
For example, he claimed the Himyarite royal title, had reparations made at the Marib dam, and continued to leave inscriptions in the Sabaic language. He also continued to wage campaigns in Central Arabia; the inscription mentioned day 5 is actually one of his!
Yesterday, we looked at what the Amirite and Himyarite inscriptions tell us about the linguistic landscape of South Arabia in the late pre-Islamic period.
Now, let's look at the socio-political environment during the same period.
~ik
The 3rd century AD saw an intensification of relations between South Arabia and the Mediterranean/Levant. These statues depicting the Himyaritic rulers Ḏamarʿalī Yuhabirr and his son, Ṯaʾban are a fantastic example of this cultural exchange.
~ik
The statues show a coalescence of Hellenistic and South Arabian features: their nudity and the headbands typical ot former, the long hair and the moustache, ot the latter.
Also: the sculptors left their signature on the statues' knees, showing Hellenistic/SA collaboration.
Today, let's look more at the Himyarites and the language of their inscriptions. They reveal some more important clues about South Arabia's linguistic landscape during the late pre-Islamic period. ~ik
The Himyarites became the main political force in S-A around 300 AD. Around 280 AD, the Himyarite ruler Yāsir Yuhanʿim conquered the Sabaeans; his successor Šammar Yuharʿiš took parts of Ḥaḍramawt. By the early 4th century all of Ḥaḍramawt had been conquered ~ik
The Himyarites' success is reflected in the language of the inscriptions. From the 4th to the 6th centuries, all the S-A inscriptions are written in what we call Late Sabaic.
The differences are both linguistic and paleographic. ~ik