there's a phenomenon that @realDonaldTrump, @elonmusk, @mtaibbi, and a host of other famous and influential persons—especially celebrity #CEOs—have done well to exploit. they've milked this phenomenon for every ounce and every drop of social credit that can be wrung.
(1/x)
it's simply this: @elonmusk *looks* incompetent, which somehow "proves" he's a master planner.
somehow the strings of public embarrassments and temper tantrums and arbitrary decisions adds up to a grand strategy. that's what an #ElonMusk acolyte would say, anyway.
(2/x)
as always, I can't guess as to whether @mtaibbi or @bariweiss or @ShellenbergerMD or any of the other smaller disasters who've crowded round the larger disaster that is @elonmusk *really* believes in the man. I use words like "cult" but I don't know if it's accurate.
(3/x)
in any case, the elaborate pretence that @elonmusk MUST know what he's doing is but one instance of a much larger-scale problem. #capitalism and Western civilization and #Christianity are all suffering from this ailment: they're full of people who ask to be taken on faith.
(4/x)
it's one of the most reliable traits of these clowns: no matter how many times they've been refuted or embarrassed, they *keep going*, with the expectation that all their words be taken at face value.
it's their secret to success, and it's an artifact of #Christianity: it's easy to pretend like you always know what you're doing, if you pretend (like @dalepartridge or @DouthatNYT does) that when you open your mouth, it's really God who's doing all the talking.
(6/x)
and God makes no mistakes, so that "proves" @dalepartridge makes no mistakes, and it "proves" that people like @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump make no mistakes, because they're but instruments in the hands of the #Christian God.
we in the Pnictogen Wing are perhaps nearly alone in thinking that "flat-Earth" people, i.e. human beings who cling to the notion that the Earth is not a spheroid but instead a disc, are not totally pointless.
flat-Earthers are, for most of Western society, safe targets.
(1/x)
for that reason alone, we are drawn to try understanding the phenomenon better, rather than simply discard flat-Earthism and its adherents as worthless and laughable.
what drives a person to endorse such a quixotic worldview, one that insures their permanent ostracism?
(2/x)
there's emotional benefits to belonging in a mostly-despised faction, of course. the faction experiences so much pressure from outside, the society *inside* the bubble is practically forced to be orderly and well-disclipined—a safe haven from an otherwise chaotic world.
#capitalism is essentially *backwards* looking. yes, capitalists attempt to pretend that they're the masters of #innovation and advancement of #technology, the builders of the #future, and all that.
it's lies—mere #marketing. capitalists do not like progress or change.
(1/x)
corporate #management and #executive persons want one thing above all others: guaranteed #money. they want *safe bets*. they don't want #competition or #risk; they want a steady source of "passive income" that always goes up and up.
(yes, I know that #capitalism and the #business community, not to mention all #politics and #journalism these days, blame #inflation on the profligate #consumer—but in reality, inflation occurs because capitalists always want *more #money*; it has to come from somewhere.)
#Christians and #Christianity are infamously *randy* and sex-obsessed, and it's difficult to accept that this fact is widely grasped and understood, yet it's still socially forbidden to bring it up. it's *rude* to point out too loudly that Christians are fixated on sex.
(1/x)
in the #Bible Belt of America, churches exist cheek-by-jowl with porn shops—American #Christians consume more pornography than the rest of America, and engage in enthusiastic commerce for the satisfaction of their sexual pleasures.
and they can't stop talking about it.
(2/x)
one senses that they *speak from experience*. reactionary right-wing #Christians of the @dalepartridge / @MattWalshBlog sort love blithering about the evils of fleshly pleasures in such a way that lets us know, they're thinking about these things a lot. they are *tempted*.
one of the most curious stories that came out during the 2016 campaign, during which the inept candidacy of @HillaryClinton succumbed to the neo-fascıst movement and @mtaibbi's best friend @realDonaldTrump, was this act of petty corporate theft.
Trump, or rather his tax-shelter @TrumpFoundation (every rich #entrepreneur-criminal has a "foundation" of some sort, useful both for tax purposes and as a place to furnish sinecure jobs to cousins and loyal toadies and so on), was accused of fiddling money from a charity.
(2/x)
@realDonaldTrump's @GOP defenders (*not* including @mtaibbi, whose fandom for Trump and the GOP was predictably late in developing) tried to pretend that Trump or his people couldn't have possibly done such a thing: after all, Trump's already rich! on paper, anyway.
none of us in the Pnictogen Wing is an expert in semiotics—that's the academic discipline pertaining to the study and meaning of *symbolism*. but we feel that we've been forced to take an amateur interest in the field mostly because *symbols* are much abused and exploited.
right-wing frauds like @jordanbpeterson and @ConceptualJames have done a land-office business in pretending to be experts in symbolism.
political ideologues, particularly reactionary #conservative ideologues, know that symbols are powerful, and wish to seize that power.
(2/x)
consider that diagram of Peterson's, the one I cited earlier—the concentric circles on a grey field labelled "The Dragon of Chaos". I'll copy it here for convenience.
I perceive that Peterson is consciously imitating the style of a *scientific* or technical diagram.
I would like to talk about this business of *holes* in #semiconductor physics.
these _holes_ furnish us with a valuable lesson in how one can model the *absence* of something as though it were the *presence* of something else—as physical objects with discrete properties.
an ideal crystal of silicon, or any other material used in making semiconductors, defines a fixed and predictable structure of nuclei in a rigid lattice. these nuclei might oscillate slightly about their mean positions within the lattice but mostly, their places are *set*.
(2/x)
the lattice of nuclei, in turn, defines an expected and predictable cloud of electron density that surrounds the positively charged nuclei. the overall charge balance through this structure is zero.
excess electrons, or *missing* electrons, produce deviations from zero.