#BBC and other media keeps quoting Russian mouth pieces issuing warnings. Whenever media quotes RU officials, the context and facts must be clarified. In this case:
- #Russia started its war of conquest against #Ukraine. Now they face consequences.
- Nearly entire RU army was sent into #Ukraine. That force is spent. RU will not be able to renew its offensive capability for the rest of 2023.
- Tactical battles will contiue, RU keeps some reserve, but it is UKR #counteroffensive which will decide what will happen next.
2/9
- It is very unlikely that RU will be able to continue the defense of the occupied territories without another major mobilization.
- #Finland or #Japan could march all the way to Moscow largely unopposed, because there is barely any RU army left which is not in #Ukraine.
3/9
- RU spent most of its missile stockpile on #Ukraine. It now sends missiles straight from the production line, with only a small critical reserve kept.
- The remaining RU missile stockpile is not even remotely close to #NATO stockpile, let alone the conventional NATO force.
4/9
- #Ukraine demonstrated that MIM-104 #Patriot, #NASAMS and #IRIS-T arey extremely effective in taking out RU missiles.
- These air-defense systems already protect the #NATO eastern flank. More systems are being acquired. In addition to advanced jets patrolling the sky.
5/9
- The bottom line: #Russia has been badly beaten in its war against #Ukraine. It can still inflict damage to Ukraine, but Russia is otherwise very vulnerable.
- In conventional military force, Russia has nothing to escalate with. It has no means to defend itself either.
6/9
- "But nukes! What about the tactical nukes?!" Yes, there is a probability of their use. This could be a whole new thread, but to keep it short: the probability remains low, because it would raise the conflict to a truly global level with devastating consequences for Russia.
7/9
- Western commentators often forget that the Russian political establishment has a lot of fears. There is a strong feeling of resentment, but also inferiority complex. The "collective Putin" fears the regime change but also the Western military power (see Able Archer 83).
8/9
#Russian scaremongering stems both from their fears and propaganda, to convince their own and Western societies that their impotent military is still strong.
So, whenever media quotes RU officials and possible "escalation" because of #Ukraine: keep all this reality in mind!
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- First, some historical context: France, just like #Britain, is a declining power. This process started with the loss of colonies after the World War 2.
- A clear geopolitical shift happen with the Suez Crisis in 1956, which marked the emergence of #USA and #USSR as the world powers.
- #France also experienced a humiliating military defeat by #Germany during the World War 2. That shaped rather pretentious politics of ...
2/18
.. Charles de Gaulle, who tried to restore the French power with dissenting views vis-a-vis #Americans and #British (or the "collective Anglo-Saxons"). In 1966, #France withdrawn from the #NATO's military command.
#Ukraine: the window of opportunity for the #counteroffensive has opened. Only the Ukrainian General Staff knows when and where it will take place, but it is imminent.
Some notes and points to watch:
- It will be a tough fight against the entrenched RU forces ..
🧵 1/10
.. and #Ukraine will not avoid attrition, but UKR has the necessary capability and a very realistic chance of success.
- The stakes of the upcoming operation are very high. If UKR will fail to achieve the strategic breakthrough, then the war might head into a stalemate.
2/10
- If UKR forces will reach the shore in the south, then it will not only break the RU land bridge to Crimea, severely disrupting RU logistics, but will also reopen the access to the Sea of Azov. It would open a new avenue for operations in the sea and many problems for RU.
#Ukraine certainly needs F-16s in the long term, but they would also be beneficial in the short term. A quick thread:
- UKR Air Force operates MiG-29 and Su-27/25/24 with old airframes, old avionics, weak radars and nearly no integration with the Western missiles/pods.
🧵.. 1/7
This is an old and technologically inferior equipment which has to be replaced. F-16 is most widely available multirole Western fighter jet and therefore it is the most practical candidate for #Ukraine's transition from the Soviet-era to the Western jets and missiles.
2/7
- UKR pilots can easily learn how to fly it. That is not a problem. However, it is unrealistic that UKR could conduct Composite Air Operations (COMAO) or SEAD/DEAD missions. Not only because it takes A LOT of training (and auxiliary systems) but also because RU ...
3/7