Why have they caused such an outcry? Let me see if I can articulate why.
In another article (nytimes.com/2018/05/18/sty…), Peterson suggested "enforced monogamy".
If so, that's hardly a radical position. There have always been people saying marriage is good, and there probably always will be.
BUT, it seems to mean more than that.
91 percent disapprove of infidelity. 83 percent disapprove of polygamy.
time.com/4575495/divorc…
washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2…
Monogamy, in other words, is still extremely common.
brookings.edu/blog/social-mo…
So what the heck are Douthat, Peterson, and the other socially conservative men talking about???
Maybe "enforced monogamy" means something more extreme that what we already have. Something much darker.
It summons all sorts of dark visions of totalitarian methods being used to control women's lives and behavior.
* Weakened divorced laws
* Revoking of abortion rights to discourage women from having casual sex
* Decriminalization of male violence against women who cheat (or who they think cheat)
* Decriminalization of marital rape
Women's sexuality is not a commodity to be regulated by the government for men's benefit.
Any seeming suggestion to the contrary rightfully causes an outcry.
A) be more concrete about the changes they'd like to see, and
B) be more explicit that they DON'T view women and women's sexuality as commodities to be allocated to men.
(end)
It praises monogamy at length, but doesn't discuss what additional policy levers might be employed to "enforce" it.