Profile picture
Gavin Schmidt @ClimateOfGavin
, 4 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Can't we just stop with ridiculous counterpoints that dissolve into mere contrarianism at the slightest consideration of the actual data?
This is the size of the plausible signal of the anthropocene 'event'/'transition' compared to the size of the event at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary.
People who think this is simply a metaphysical conceit to put humans at the center of the geological universe are delusional.
And for people who are clutching pearls at the sight of RCP85, here are the other scenarios. None of this is a worse case scenario - climate sensitivity here is ~2.5ºC, and from a simulation w/o CH4 or CC feedbacks.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Gavin Schmidt
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!