Dismissing Trump's tweets are irrelevant to obstruction of justice is legally incorrect
Let me explain
goo.gl/3pDXfA
Obstructing an investigation is a crime if there is "corrupt intent"
Intent is a tricky concept. You don't get to peer directly inside someone's skull
So you look at all the data points we have
goo.gl/3pDXfA
For example, the Lester Holt interview where Trump says he fired Comey to end the Russia investigation
The tweets are more data points
popular.info/p/the-case-for…
They suggest that Trump is seeking to stop Mueller to protect himself, his associates and his campaign
Each time Trump tweets, it strengthens Mueller's case on intent
popular.info/p/the-case-for…
Probably not.
Does it strengthens Mueller's case for obstruction of justice by providing more evidence of corrupt intent.
Absolutely.
popular.info/p/the-case-for…
He's more likely to issue a report to Congress arguing that Trump broke the law
If he issues such a report, I would be shocked if it didn't include numerous tweets by Trump
popular.info/p/the-case-for…