Profile picture
Greg West @GregWest_HALOJM
, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
Bill Clinton had SCOTUS nominations while he was under investigation because he was under investigation nearly his entire presidency. Should they be removed from the SCOTUS because they were nominated by a president that was under investigation that also perjured himself?
You can't complain about one president doing something and disregard what another president did. President Obama's administration was investigated about Fast & Furious should his nominations have been stopped as well?
Nearly every president has had some type of investigation, warranted or not, during the time of their administration and often they are appointing people to the bench or to cabinet level positions. Stopping appointments due to investigations would paralyze government entirely.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Greg West
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!