I have not tweeted one word doubting Ford's story (thought I have certainly mocked and criticized the process to get her to testify) and have been waiting to hear her out. But this Ramirez story reads so insanely fake I can't believe it's being entertained.
I mean, is this a joke. 35 years later she wasn't sure but 35 years plus 6 days later she was? 
Everyone she named who would have been there or heard about it categorically denies seeing it happen or ever hearing about it. But then Farrow gets random others to say she's a good person who would never lie and they "cannot imagine her making this up." Start imagining, dude.
I can't remember the last time I was this angry about something in politics. This is disgusting.
You know what else pisses me off. It’s not that the right isn’t susceptible to believing an obviously made up story about someone on the left. But she would get interviewed in like patriotsinamericaforever.us or some ish. The left has the premier #MeToo journalist at bat for this.
Ronan Farrow, Jane Mayer and the New Yorker ran with a story where the accuser still, today, right now, can not say that the person she is accusing actually is the one who did what she is alleging. IS THAT NUTS.
Is anyone on the left calling out this bs story? If roles were reversed plenty of people on the right would.
Anyone pushing idea Ramirez is a “second accuser” doesn’t care about facts or truth. She literally still can not say it was Kavanaugh. She is literally unable to accuse him in the New Yorker story. Disgraceful.
No, I won't believe women who are not believable. My piece on this fiasco is up at @FoxNews: foxnews.com/opinion/2018/0…
