Some tips/ideas/advice …others should chime in! (THREAD)
1. Don’t overvalue reactions from famous advisors. These folks can be out of touch w/ cutting edge style, methods, and substantive debates. They often have idiosyncratic tastes about what is good/not good work. Best to triangulate w/ input from junior faculty
1. Present at internal and external venues. Most important is to get eyes on it from folks outside your home Ph.D. program. Reviewers will be from outside your intellectual womb, so get those kinds of reactions early, often
1. Think carefully about reviewer name suggestions (if journal asks for them). Many reviewers will review manuscripts they have seen in earlier iterations. If you know a fan of your work, don’t necessarily leave them off the list