,
29 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
This Day in Labor History: February 17, 1992. Yale graduate students go on strike. Let's talk about grad school unionization and its importance to the labor movement today. 
Graduate student unionization has long been controversial on college campuses. Are graduate students primarily students or apprentices?
The answer should be obvious that all graduate students getting paid for work are workers, but you would be surprised how many liberal faculty members simply cannot accept this idea.
Graduate students are not only workers, but particularly vulnerable workers, in spite of their high levels of education. Especially in the sciences, where a lot of funding depends on the relationship with a single professor, students are quite vulnerable.
That is especially true of women and the sexual harassment of female students has long influenced support for unionization among graduate students in the sciences.
The first move toward graduate student unionization took place in tumult of the 1960s, as a lot of politically active undergraduates went on to graduate school.
Rutgers and CUNY were the first graduate school units to be covered by a collective bargaining contract, as they were covered by faculty contracts.
The University of Wisconsin was the first graduate student union to negotiate their own independent contract in 1970. The University of Michigan and University of Oregon soon followed.
At Yale, the struggle would be and still is a much longer struggle. T.A. Solidarity was the original organizing group, founded in 1987. That turned into the Graduate Employees and Student Organization (GESO) in 1990.
Students began organizing to demand union recognition. Yale administrators rejected this from the beginning, refusing to recognize the union as a bargaining unit for the graduate students.
By the time it went on strike in February 1992, the GESO represented 1300 of Yale’s 2200 graduate students. Its demands were union recognition, a pay raise, a grievance procedure, and the expansion of time granted to complete the Ph.D. The strike was announced for three days.
It received significant support from other unions, frustrating Yale administrators who hoped to isolate the strikers.
49% of union members at Yale refused to work in solidarity with the striking graduate employees, with much greater support among the maintenance and cafeteria workers (75% did not show up for work) than the technical and clerical workers (about 30% did not show up).
Many faculty were of course opposed. “They really are among the blessed of the earth,” Prof. Peter Brooks, chairman of the department of comparative literature, said. “So I sometimes feel annoyed at them seeing themselves as exploited.” What a jerk.
Despite these labor actions, Yale still refused to negotiate with the students.
The 1992 strike ended without recognition although the administration did raise the pay of the TAs and provide teacher training, showing how strikes can create real victories for workers even when the union remain unrecognized as a bargaining unit.
Strikes continued from time to time, including a 1996 strike that only ended when the administration threatened to fire all the strikers because they did not submit student grades as a bargaining tool, despite an overwhelming vote in favor of unionization among the students.
In 2003, another strike took place but in that year, the GESO suffered a big setback as student/workers voted against unionization by a narrow margin, giving the administration much more ammunition in its continued determination to never recognize a graduate student union.
But a 2005 strike again resulted in the administration providing a lot what the students wanted, including a pay raise for graduate student teachers and new initiatives on faculty diversity and child care.
Over the years, graduate student unionization has increased at public universities in non-right-to-leech states, including at the University of Rhode Island. But until recently, graduate student unionization campaigns at private universities remained almost impossible to win.
For a very long time, only NYU had a union contract with its students, with all the other private schools led by the modern version of Henry Clay Frick and Henry Ford, unionbusters all.
1951 and 1972 court cases ended with National Labor Relations Boar rulings prohibiting the National Labor Relations Act from covering private school graduate students because they are primarily students.
In the end, university administrations are some of the best union-busters in the nation.
Given the number of self-identified liberals with backgrounds in fields where they study race, class, and gender who are in administrations, it’s sickening to see them turn on treating graduate workers with respect.
That faculty use the tools of oppression they decry in their own scholarship against exploitable workers is unbelievably hypocritical. Any faculty member who supports justice in their scholarship but does not support graduate student unionization is either a liar or a hypocrite.
The Yale graduate students are continuing the fight to organize. Now affiliated with UNITE-HERE, major issues include mental health care, fairness in funding, and greater diversity at Yale.
When we think about the labor movement over the last few decades, we often tend to forget about the importance of the academy.
Graduate students and, to a lesser extent, faculty, have proven some of the bright spots in American labor and with the collapse of the industrial unions, public sector workers of all types have risen in importance in the world of organized labor.
Back on Wednesday to discuss the Panic of 1893 and its impact on American workers.
