Why was it important to FIRST clean house within the FBI & DOJ (public info)?
Why was it important to FIRST clean house within other ABC agencies (non_public info)?
What are the duties of the FBI?
What are the duties of the DOJ?
What vested powers does POTUS have re: MIL INTEL vs. ABC agencies re: matters of NAT SEC (HOMELAND)?
Think 'umbrella surv'.
What agency does the FBI report to?
What is the role of the AG?
How many FBI & DOJ were FIRED/FORCED?
Does 'Russia' recusal prevent/block AG from this responsibility?
What time period did this occur?
Who appointed and tasked HUBER?
Who appointed and tasked the OIG?
[zero leaks - none]
Transfer from AG1 to AG2?
Why might that be important?
How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'?
Optics are important.
When are optics not important?
Define 'stage set'.
What 'stage' experience did this person have?
Think Bill Clinton impeachment.
Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?
If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin?
Define 'thesis' statement.
What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?
If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH?
If not tasked & targeted under FVEY - what legal authority existed to engage the targeting?
Think Nunes' statement "not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY)."
What entity paid for the 'research' dossier?
What US Ally completed the collection of false data?
Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US?
How do you circumvent US LAW?
Was the 'other' data (collection/process) worse than the dossier?
Why didn't FISC require 'in room' presentations of the data prior to 'sign off'?
Who signed apps 1-4?
Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals?
Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).
How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?
Sometimes reading between the lines provides…
"Huber says every one of the prosecutors is already handling about twenty cases."
Thank you, Anon.
Note: Not all are USA v. [ ]
Nothing to see here.
Read the comments.
Those still asleep buying the 'narrow' scope 'new narrative' shift.
If the scope memo was never unclassified (v2) how do D's make this statement?
More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.
If 'evidence' exists(ed), under 'broad' scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the 'intended engagement'?
If 'evidence' exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?
Control of the Narrative.
You should update your T-banner pic to properly reflect the crowd size when the event actually started.
Have you ever witnessed a public all-out attack by the opposition party against the President of the United States?
Patriots in Control.
On the schedule.
The Great Awakening.