,
56 tweets,
15 min read
Read on Twitter
Ty @ThomasS4217 ! I can’t get download
“2 different forms of connections between the IRA and members of the Trump Campaign” 
👆promoting the hacked materials. Ya mean these?👇
Oh. Gilligan. “The company otherwise had no sources of income” 🤔
👆👇 “own proprietary funds as well as several Gulf-based sovereign wealth funds” 🤔
“The Office was unable to obtain additional evidence or testimony about who Page may have met or communicated with in Moscow, thus, Page’s activities in Russia-as described in his emails with the Campaign-were not fully explained.”
Really 🤔 on “Despite these representations to the Campaign...”
Jr. “declined to be voluntarily interviewed by the Office”
I’m sorry. But wut?!? Sessions. 👀 Intent
“The manner in which the President acted provides additional evidence of his intent. Rather than rely on official channels, the President met with Lewandowski alone in the Oval Office.” And 👀 the box
And again. Sessions. “There is evidence that at least one purpose of the President’s conduct toward Sessions was to have Sessions assume control over the Russia investigation and supervise it in a way that would restrict its scope.”
“A reasonable inference from those statements and the President’s actions is that the President believes that an unrecused Attorney General would play a protective role and could shield the President from the ongoing Russia investigation.”
McGahn ➡️ “Substantial evidence indicates that in repeatedly urging McGahn to dispute that he was ordered to have the Special Counsel terminated, the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn’s account in order to deflect...” (1/2)
👆(2/2) “...further scrutiny of the President’s conduct towards the investigation.” 👀 “Several facts support that conclusion.”
Manafort ➡️ “Evidence concerning the President’s conduct toward Manafort indicates that the President intended to encourage Manafort to not cooperate with the government”
“Some evidence supports a conclusion that the President intended, at least in part, to influence the jury.”
Cohen ➡️ “In analyzing the President’s conduct related to Cohen, the following evidence is relevant to the elements of obstruction of justice.”
“In analyzing the President’s intent in his actions towards Cohen as a potential witness, the evidence could support the inference that the President intended to discourage Cohen from cooperating with the government...” (1/2)
👆(2/2) “... because Cohen’s information would shed adverse light on the President’s campaign-period conduct and statements.”
“Accordingly, based on the analysis above, we were not persuaded by the argument that the President has blanket constitutional immunity to engage in acts that would corruptly obstruct justice through the otherwise-valid Article II powers.”
👆Footnote👇”Indeed the Impeachment Judgment Clause recognizes that criminal law plays an important role in addressing an official’s conduct, distinct from the political remedy of impeachment.”
👆”...and Congress is not restricted to relying only on impeachment, rather than making criminal law applicable to a former President, as OLC has recognized.”
👆”(“Recognizing an immunity from prosecution for a sitting president would not preclude such prosecution once the President’s term is over or he is otherwise removed from office by resignation or impeachment”)”
“At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.”
👆”Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
From Appendix 🤔 who slides in these alphabetical slots?
Tweeto written responses ➡️ Appendix C ➡️ pgs 427-439
Appendix D ➡️ Referred & completed cases ➡️ pgs 443-448
👆
Ooh 👀 Sounds familiar on Assange giving password assistance. Jr.
Battleground states. 🤔 Manafort
Ya don’t say.
Nevins.
Barrack.
H/t @Stephaniefishm4
Hickabee
McGahn
See. Footnote.
👆👇
🤔
Yanukovych eh?!? Pinchuk funded that Skadden report 🤔
