Thread by @HiMaui

🚨 PAY ATTENTION 🚨 MICROTARGETING & T E S T I N G seems to be underway re: dem nomination

This is sickening. I'll take you step x step what I see. This might take a while

see exhibit A - Dem Nominee Voter Opinion

@fbi @FBIWFO @FBISanFrancisco @FBINewYork @FBISanAntonio 1/

^ as you gaze at favorability among candidates for the democratic nomination, you will notice all the colors, & THEN...you'll UNDENIABLY SEE SYMMETRICAL PATTERNS at SPECIFIC INTERVALS.

THIS. IS. NOT. NORMAL.
it's MANIPULATED

in a seemingly "sweeping and systemic fashion"

2/

B. Poling starts 12/9, until 1/17, not much happening, not much change among 6 candidates. Seems like "baseline" data. As 6 announce run for nom, microtargeting looks like it's collecting data.

Bottom solid green bar doesn't show much variability, mostly level & normal-ish.

3/

B1. 1/17 decided shift &2 more announce run
Jan17-23 something happens this week.
ALL CANDIDATES shift up or down at beginning & end of week.

IMO targeted psyop that week & results show on 23rd. ALL shift up/down just a bit, nothing outside NORM for ppl to notice something

4/

B2. AND with the DELIBERATE SHIFTS in favor +1, -1, or even +2 or -2,

MATHEMATICALLY it is ZERO. IT'S PRISTINE. "no meddling"

because the GREEN BAR on the bottom remains UNCHANGED.

LOOK at all of that SYMMETRICAL INTERFERENCE SHOWING NOTHING

5/

B2a - try this picture instead for the above ^

the green bar is unchanged...the stats leave zero trace of an intervention during that period.

6/

B3.

So what in the world was happening starting Jan 17?

For starters, TOMI LAHREN picked a fight with CARDI B.
ODD HUH?
& then Tomi was only trending & twitter booted her; Cardib tweet count went down by 2k tweets/hr within 5 minutes per twitter.

Which is CRAZY BC....

7/

B4.

Crazy Tomi Lahren would pick a fight with Cardi B when COINCIDENTALLY it LOOKS LIKE microtargeting & disinformation

IS TARGETING THE WOMEN'S VOTE & WOMEN CANDIDATES.

HARRIS
WARREN
BOOKER (bc of African American women's vote)
KLOBUCHAR

ALL START a systematic increase

8/

B5. (oops, Klobuchar's identical trend starts later feb 4)

Harris + .2
Warren- 1.5
Booker + .7

Top 3 male favorability:
Biden -1.5 (there was talk of a Biden/Warren at some point, I find it important that they BOTH dropped 1.5 on the same day).
Sanders -1.0
O'Rourke - .6

9/

B6.

also the GREEN BAR drops 1 point given on average 1.0 differential from the 22nd to the 23rd for 8 candidates. Biden & Warren dropped the MOST, WHY?

Joe Biden January headlines "timed" with disinfo campaign above?

B7.

Elizabeth Warren favor dropped 1.5 points, exactly the same as Joe Biden the week of Jan 17-23 - WHY?

these were most common headlines for Warren: Puerto Rico, heritage, Wells Fargo.

B8. Differential week of Jan 17 - 23 during 1st known (IMO) cyberpsyop on dem voters for the 2020 democratic presidential nominee

that op seemingly WORKED on @SenWarren as her favor continued to fall 3 pts by January 30th

did NOT work on @JoeBiden as he went up +1

9/

C.

JANUARY 29.

there's a surge - do you see it?
Joe Biden suddenly surges 2.4 points, you can see the green block on the bottom suddenly go up

headlines hint of Joe running, but he should wait jan29

10/

C1.

January 30. apparently a Joe Biden run floods the news - IMHO don't think trump camp was expecting Biden surge & to be so prominent

SO WHY NOT BRING IN HOWARD. SCHULTZ. HUH???

fake candidate. check his twitter. he can't be bothered to tweet

11/

C2.

BEFORE I FORGET ~ want you to see HOW UNNATURAL THE polling is for the democratic nominee process - LOOK AT THE "sweeping and systemic fashion" of the SYMMETRY of current process, C

VS.

2012 Republican Presidential nomination...TOTALLY DIFFERENT

(btw-taking a break)

12/

PART C3.

So Biden had ONLY unexpected surge on Jan 29, otherwise Sanders & Beto, the other top 2 male candidates were UNCHANGED.

Hinslee, Hickenlooper, Gabbard enter field (bottom lines) & have IDENTICAL fluctuations.

13/

C4.

🚨FEB 3.

HIGHLY TARGETED OP: testing Harris v Beto, plus Warren.

Harris & Warren exactly +1.0
Beto -0.2

UNCHANGED: Biden, Sanders, Booker, Castro, Gillibrand, Klobuchar

❌ = HARRIS / BETO FLIP

🚨 TAKE NOTE: when FLIPS happened in 2016, they permanently HURT HRC

14/

C5.

❌ 2016 election - 3 major flips with HRC

1. When Michael Schmitt's NYTimes article ran re: HRC emails,
2. when BS launched campaign on the heels of the times,

15/

https://twitter.com/HiMaui/status/1089029844460023815

C6.

3. During DNC (will link later)

not a FLIP, but HRC never recovered HERE:
HRC's proprietary data searched, downloaded, extorted by BS staffers incl Uretsky. IMO data used, LOOK how BS/HRC favor symmetrically diverge, & inversely proportionate

16/

https://twitter.com/HiMaui/status/1088980188346662912

C7.

❌ = Harris' favor CROSSES Beto's. Voter favor FLIPPED. IMO flips are DEADLY. My limited observations = candidates never recover. Damaged.

➡️ day KH's favor crosses Beto, EW's favor + 1.0 point JUST LIKE HARRIS

Warren flips Beto in 2wks
KH & EWtrends = IDENTITICAL

17/

Thread on tweets/news re: Beto, Kamala, Elizabeth during that week ^

18/

https://twitter.com/HiMaui/status/1122362972469383169

BOTH graphs, show SYSTEMIC op rolling out successive cyber-psyop campaigns targeting Beto

Feb 3 - Harris flips BO
Feb 16 - Warren flips
Feb 22 - Booker hits threshold - can't flip

Notice ALL 3 HAVE IDENTICAL PATTERN W/ROLLOUT!

"...in sweeping & systemic fashion..."

19/

it's important to analyze tweets/headlines during above weeks ending Feb 3, Feb 16, Feb 22 - by midweek disinfo firmly dominates SM, & bursts by Friday/weekend & just prior to polling day (Monday).

all my #faketrends #hamiltondashboard tweets past 2 yrs support this.

20/

Momentum is EVERYTHING to DT. think RATINGS.

the MAGAbomber Cesar Sayoc REALLY RUINED the last week heading into November - DT couldn't regain MSM narrative UNTIL he went to PA after synagogue bombing.

https://twitter.com/HiMaui/status/1056080388358131712

It's like there's a method to his madness & insensitivity...he's consumed with a different form of attacks and he's losing.

usnews.com/news/top-news/…

In retrospect, Trump was asked NOT to go to the Tree of Life by local leaders during their grief.

But TOL was where ALL the media was after a horrific week of the MAGAbomber - it was horrifying to Donald bc HE LOST MEDIA NARRATIVE.

AND HE WENT TO RETRIEVE IT. FULL STOP.

21/

I digress - donald’s campaign & term 💯 RELIES on CONTROL of narrative & he’ll do anything to get/keep it.

FIGURE C again.

Does this data look like a 4 stage scientific experiment?

Or (rigged) polling data?

Or both???

22/