, 3 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
@neal_katyal Neal: Lawyer/journo here. Q: was there a reason 28 CFR 600 didn't include a clause like 28 US 595 ("An independent counsel shall advise the House of Representatives of any substantial and credible information... that may constitute grounds for an impeachment")? 1/
@neal_katyal Followup: do you consider impeachment referrals to be part of the SC's charge, or just criminal matters (given 600.1)?

(Context: I'm trying to figure out why Mueller didn't outright state he was making a referral.) Thanks!

(msbellows @ gmail if that's better.)
2/2
@neal_katyal Sorry -- 28 USC 595.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to M.S. Bellows, Jr.
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!