On December 13th 1993, John Petersen and his wife entertained guests in their DC townhouse.
Those invited were the director of the CIA at the time, James Woolsey, his wife Dr Sue Woolsey and physician Dr Steven Greer.
Dr Suzanne Woolsey was, at the time, the Chief Communications Officer of the National Academy of Sciences.
She has quite the impressive resume.
sourcewatch.org/index.php/Suza…
Petersen told Dr Greer that Woolsey and his wife had seen a UFO in the late 1960’s, and ever since that experience they’ve been highly interested in the subject.
Greer claims James Woolsey became visibly upset that the information provided to him in the briefing was withheld from him by the US government, even though he was the CIA Director.
Woolsey agreed to do what he could to locate the requested documents and release them.
Indeed, Woolsey ordered a review of all Agency files on UFOs.
In 1996, the CIA published a paper titled “CIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-1990.”
cia.gov/library/center…
The report, written by Gerald Haines, a CIA and National Reconnaissance Office historian, confirmed Woolsey’s role in the origin of the study:
“In late 1993, after being pressured by Ufologists for the release of CIA information on UFOs, R James Woolsey ordered another review of all Agency files on UFOs.”
The study debunked the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs.
Haines states that half of all UFO sightings in the 50’s and 60’s were actually US secret spy planes.
Needles to say, the UFO community was not satisfied with the conclusions of the study and called it a whitewash.
I could do an entire thread on the Clinton administration’s fascination with UFOs, particularly HRC and John Podesta.
motherjones.com/politics/2016/…
Petersen also denied he said that Woolsey and his wife had seen a UFO.
Greer shot back and produced a letter allegedly showing that Petersen arranged the meeting.
siriusdisclosure.com/dr-greers-resp…
Greer is a controversial figure in the UFO community; his versions of events did not receive the community’s unanimous support.
The incident may have become forgotten if not for Catherine Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing in the George H. W. Bush Administration.
In 1998, she was approached by John Petersen with an offer to work on a project commissioned by the US Navy.
Their purpose was to come up with a plan to inform the American public about the existence of exterrestrial beings.
When Fitts expressed some apprehension, Peterson offered her the chance to meet some aliens.
Yes, you read that right. Fitts claims Petersen offered her a chance to meet aliens! 👽
Here’s what she had to say on about their meeting during a radio interview.
Petersen denies the conversation took place.
Petersen is supported by a couple of Arlington board members; however, it should be noted that Peterson considered Fitts competent enough to appoint to the Institute’s Board of Directors.
The subsequent release of the minutes from the meeting confirm that the existence of aliens was discussed as a “wild card.” The dispute is mainly over the involvement of the US Navy.
Now, I’m not suggesting everyone who appeared on Coast to Coast is a crackpot or a liar. Truth can be found in strange places, so you never know.
But numerous eccentric individuals with outside-the-mainstream ideas appeared on the program during its long run.
Coast to Coast AM is considered even less respectable than Infowars.
So I have to wonder why the former head of the CIA and a man whose opinions still commands considerable respect in DC has never been tainted by his brushes with such peculiar characters.
The fascinating documentary, Mirage Men, may provide some answers.
The focus of the doc is Richard Doty.
huffpost.com/entry/exair-fo…
Doty is a former special agent for the US Air Force Office of Special Investigations. Doty claims his role was disinformation.
He passed off hoax documents and fake info to UFO researchers to cause confusion and dissension among the group.
The US government wanted to encourage a belief in the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs to divert attention from secret and developmental military technology.
We take for granted the existence of drones; however, we can imagine how incredible they seemed not that long ago. If the public could be convinced drones or stealth crafts were flying saucers from outer space, then the US gov was more than happy to encourage that belief.
Doty began feeding information to Bennewitz, tiny parcels of truth and whole bunch of lies about the presence of extraterrestrial visitors.
Bennewitz became obsessed with an impending alien invasion.
In 1988, Bennewitz’s family became so concerned about his paranoid delusions that they had him committed to a mental health facility.
Bennewitz is an extreme example. Overall, the disinfo campaign had the desired effect of burying the truth under a mountain of lies, diverting attention from secret, developmental technologies, discrediting researchers and causing friction within the UFO community
When you think about it, the UFO researchers in the 70’s and 80’s were the forerunners of the Spygate researchers of today, even if some might not like to admit it. Those UFO researchers didn’t have social media.
They relied on self-published books, newsletters, conventions and, later with the development of the internet, chat rooms and bulletin boards.
Mirage Men is a movie all researchers should watch.
It’s makes you wonder if they are Mirage Men among Spygate researchers. There must be. And Spygate is more complex than UFO sightings.
UFO disinformation originated almost exclusively from one source, the US government (although the Air Force, Navy, CIA & NASA often did now what the other agencies were up to). There were also grifters who fabricated information to sell product, which is to be expected.
Spygate, on the other hand, involves not only different agencies with the US gov, but also political parties, complicit individuals, foreign govs, special interest groups, mainstream media organizations, etc, all with their own objectives that may or may include the truth.
I like to speculate, privately, who is spreading disinfo. However, I have never accused a researcher publicly of intentionally spreading disinfo. The person would naturally defend themselves.
Not to mention, I could simply be wrong.
It’s a waste of time and energy, and that’s exactly what a disinfo agent wants to happen.
But I don’t hesitate to speculate about public figures. So the question is -- does James Woolsey believe in the existence of aliens or is he a mirage man?
To think that Woolsey wasn’t aware of a military disinfo campaign seems a stretch. In his subsequent career he’s demonstrated a great capacity for obfuscation.
You can’t trust anything he says. He can lie without shame. His lies are in the interest of national security, you see?
Woolsey would once again find himself in a bizarre meeting on Sept 19, 2016.
JW, Flynn and Flynn Jr met with a Turkish delegation and discussed the possibility of kidnapping Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen. A “wild card” scenario, we could say.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5…
Woolsey hems-and-haws and uses intentionally imprecise language in order to avoid getting nail down to a specific allegation. He provides just enough innuendo to “dirty up” Mike Flynn.
cnn.com/2017/03/25/pol…
UFO are apparently making a comeback. Here’s a fantastic article from The Drive, published last week.
thedrive.com/the-war-zone/2…
And if UFOs are making a comeback, you can bet so are Mirage Men.