,
4 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
Let's be clear on what the White House is really arguing.
Their claim: The Dem effort to flesh out the Mueller report *to secure our elections from outside attack* is not a legitimate legislative purpose.
WH should be pressed to justify this.
New piece: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Their claim: The Dem effort to flesh out the Mueller report *to secure our elections from outside attack* is not a legitimate legislative purpose.
WH should be pressed to justify this.
New piece: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Another point:
Trump's own intelligence officials are waving red flags about Russian interference as *an ongoing threat.*
Yet Trump himself -- and his campaign manager and son in law -- tell us the Russian attack never happened.
How is this okay?
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Trump's own intelligence officials are waving red flags about Russian interference as *an ongoing threat.*
Yet Trump himself -- and his campaign manager and son in law -- tell us the Russian attack never happened.
How is this okay?
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
One more point:
How is this really the position of much of the Republican Party, the White House, and the president of the United States?
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
How is this really the position of much of the Republican Party, the White House, and the president of the United States?
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Trumpworld's position is that the Mueller report totally exonerated Trump, but also, ignore the report's findings on the Russian attack itself -- that is, at least its first 50 pages -- because that attack never happened.
Barr is lending this an assist:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Barr is lending this an assist:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
