, 4 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
I know many profs are ridiculing this article, but isn’t the question of when and whether to comply with law and ethical norms one of the classic existential questions?
Isn’t that a main thread in Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Sartre, Camus, Arendt...
@EricColumbus as usual has the goods. Sorry, you’re right. The MSM’s repeated trope of Hicks-as-Angsty-Existentialist is just too ridiculous. And this article is superficial for plenty of reasons. My bad.
Hicks: "I'm invoking my right to remain silent. And I'm also invoking Heidegger: 'In order to remain silent, Da-sein must have something to say."
(I guess you had to Be There.)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Jed Shugerman
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!