3/ Ultimate Relevance of: <> – In the then eventuated instance(s) of Chlorophyll– and Heme–based Life — independent (and (independently) self–sustaining + self–evolving) of the initial presence of Silica ~ ..
4/ .. requiring only initially the catalytic metabolism of Si and O (as s = 1 to O\sub{2} , s = ½ to O) [prequisite conditions being lost established in preparation for metabolic reaction (e.g. the “Great Oxygenation” – <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxi…> — being an event older, by a .. 
5/ .. factor of 10, than the “Great Dying” – <en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian–T…>)]
~ the continuity of this metabolism can then form Silica as a feedstock for the Chlorophyll– and Heme–based Life, such Life being in-between such Silica and this natural, healing ..
~ the continuity of this metabolism can then form Silica as a feedstock for the Chlorophyll– and Heme–based Life, such Life being in-between such Silica and this natural, healing ..
6/ .. (and non–polar) ‘light’ — then serving to close the loop on such a living system —
— the intelligently modulated (even intelligently self–modulating) voltage of the non–polar ‘light’/energy enabling initial catalytic metabolism then being (self–)enabled to ..
— the intelligently modulated (even intelligently self–modulating) voltage of the non–polar ‘light’/energy enabling initial catalytic metabolism then being (self–)enabled to ..
7/ .. continue such a metabolic reaction — the resultant Silica as feedstock always being secondarily necessary (and initially, not at all).
• <>
• <>
• <>
Cc: .@SandiaWisdom #OnMyWay 🎼 ♾✨
• <>
• <>
• <>
Cc: .@SandiaWisdom #OnMyWay 🎼 ♾✨
11 +1/ Of this 11 Pt Thread: Pts (1—5) (“3”/—“7/”):
• Per: from: Pt 5: <> –
• Per: from: Pt 5: <> –
To: Pt 10: <> —
14/ How then is such non–polar energy (() + ()) applicable to the modification — indeed, the instantiation — of mass-based life (and, in inverse reciprocity, that of ‘light’–based life)...
...re: <>? ...
...re: <>? ...
15/ ... The co–valence of the (bond) geometry of Si (per: <>) in being phase–aligned with (the {topographic and topological} contour–resonance of) that of the right–circular cycloidal harmonic (“P”) of *both*:
• O\sub{2} (s = 1), *and* ...
• O\sub{2} (s = 1), *and* ...
16/ ...
• O (s = ½) —> fully about (in 2(π) rad. *and* 1(π) rad., respectively) the (vertical) axis of the ‘centre-of-load’ — of such Chlorophyll– and Heme–based Life itself (as mass > 0.0 g) — this axis being that of absolute stationarity (as to both: (i) oscillation, and ...
• O (s = ½) —> fully about (in 2(π) rad. *and* 1(π) rad., respectively) the (vertical) axis of the ‘centre-of-load’ — of such Chlorophyll– and Heme–based Life itself (as mass > 0.0 g) — this axis being that of absolute stationarity (as to both: (i) oscillation, and ...
17/ ... (ii) conventional motion (of mass through space, i.e. work) ~ seeing all *living* Oxygen bonds for *both* Silica *and* SiO are stable), can only resolve to:
2 = 1 (or, (1 = ½), etc., in such sequentially additive doubling and halving) non–contradictorily if the ...
2 = 1 (or, (1 = ½), etc., in such sequentially additive doubling and halving) non–contradictorily if the ...
18/ ... intermediate axis of such (stationary) ‘revolution’ — orthogonal to this former axis (and bisecting it**) — is that of such full circumference (“C”), being not:
r = 0 (at the point** of their intersection), but such that:
C = π (requiring the bestowal of the quality ...
r = 0 (at the point** of their intersection), but such that:
C = π (requiring the bestowal of the quality ...
19/ ... of “length” itself to this point applies neither to: (i) oscillation**, nor (ii) conventional motion** (of mass through space, i.e. work)), for if it did, a *logical* contradiction would result — which is possible (ref. e.g. Gödel) — whereas a *practical* ‘real world’ ...
20/ ... contradiction is not existentially possible):
The conclusion – and answer – to this original question (Pt 14) is not a matter of *logical* (i.e. binary) choice — but in its present applicability is one that can only resolve to practical consequence — esp. under the ...
The conclusion – and answer – to this original question (Pt 14) is not a matter of *logical* (i.e. binary) choice — but in its present applicability is one that can only resolve to practical consequence — esp. under the ...
21/ ... prevailing modally–binary condition of:
Whatsoever that practical consequence will be, for those individual agencies that cannot avoid action /motion (ref. “3/” as: Pt 1):
As ontologically — and legally — as existentially:
• <doyleindustries.com/letters>: .@IvankaTrump
Whatsoever that practical consequence will be, for those individual agencies that cannot avoid action /motion (ref. “3/” as: Pt 1):
As ontologically — and legally — as existentially:
• <doyleindustries.com/letters>: .@IvankaTrump
@threadreaderapp unroll
