apnews.com/36f5e67a145c4f…
This is anti-moral because it does not, indeed refuses to, weigh the moral difference between two things that cannot be moral equivalents. It’s also lazy and dangerous.
To understand why the GOP prefers an anti-moral press, to understand the evils masked by an anti-moral press, you have to understand what’s wrong with racism in a republic.
That’s an easy choice.
Because all that matters is who’s in & who’s out. The in-group’s motives are always good. The out-group’s motives are always bad. Even if the out-group does the same thing as the in-group, it’s bad. Ergo, questions of hypocrisy are meaningless.
Think about the impact such thinking has on a democracy. When you believe the out-group always has malign intent, no disagreement can be tolerated. If there is no room for disagreement, it’s a democracy in name only.
But the real frame is between democracy and anti-democracy.
stoehr.substack.com/p/for-2020-its…
I’m working as hard as I can but I can’t do it all.
If you can, please subscribe ($5/mo.) and support my work!
(Just click the red button.)
Many thanks! —JS
stoehr.substack.com/subscribe?utm_…