,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
So the whole press spent the day analyzing how rhetoric from one side is allegedly responsible for mass shootings while ignoring that the mass shooters were also parroting rhetoric from the other side.
You see the problem and why people dismiss the media on days like this?
You see the problem and why people dismiss the media on days like this?
Actual quotes from Daytona mass shooter:
“I want socialism, and i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding”
“Vote blue for Gods sake”
He expressed support for “the squad”
Indicated he would vote for Warren. He hated Trump.
google.com/amp/s/heavy.co…
“I want socialism, and i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding”
“Vote blue for Gods sake”
He expressed support for “the squad”
Indicated he would vote for Warren. He hated Trump.
google.com/amp/s/heavy.co…
In other words, we had one mass shooter ok the far-right (though he also backed climate alarmism and single-payer) in El Paso and one on the far-left in Daytona.
Yet the media has declared that we only need to be concerned about rhetoric from one side. You see the issue?
Yet the media has declared that we only need to be concerned about rhetoric from one side. You see the issue?
Of course we could try focusing on the actual victims and underlying issues instead of trying to blame political opponents for the actions of these crazy evil people.
But what isn’t acceptable is to try to selectively pin this incitement standard on one side.
But what isn’t acceptable is to try to selectively pin this incitement standard on one side.
Anyways, here is my thread in the actual policy issues involved in mass shooting and how we should approach the topic:
