Thread by @JamesHasson20

The biggest bias in media is not how things are covered, but which things are covered and which are ignored. There's been no media pushback on the lie that Stacey Abrams should have won. But Snopes has repeatedly "fact-checked" the Babylon Bee since 2018.
vogue.com/article/stacey…

The claim that Abrams was cheated out of victory is contradicted by all available evidence, but it's been repeated by Dem 2020 candidates as if it were the gospel truth.

Abrams lost by 54k votes. There were only 30k provisional ballots cast denied. The math just doesn't add up.

Furthermore, the law that Abrams and Co. blame for her loss—a law that purges voters from the rolls after they've been inactive for several elections—was passed by a Dem legislature and signed by a Dem Gov in 1997.

This article is a pretty good deep-dive on the myth repeated by Abrams and almost every major Dem 2020 candidate. It rebuts every claim made by Abrams et. al. I'm pretty sure @AG_Conservative and others have done threads debunking Abrams's claim too. nationalreview.com/2019/06/stacey…

But the bottom line is this: that "fact-checkers" like Snopes are spending their time "fact-checking" satirical articles about whether CNN has an industrial-sized washing machine to "spin the news"—but are ignoring this blatant lie—is a damning indictment of our media.