Harvard Professor Steven Levitsky and conservative columnist @JRubinBlogger agree on how to get out of this mess:
The GOP needs to be crushed in 2020 so that a center-right party can arise from the ashes.
America needs a center right party.
Over the past few decades, the GOP transitioned from a conservative to an authoritarian / reactionary party.
For more on how that happened, see ⤵️
Trump is the result of that transition.
@Maxboot, @justinamash, @JRubinBlogger and others had what you might call a rude awakening⤵️
True conservatives now find themselves without a party.
The only real solution, he says, is for the GOP to suffer a series of electoral defeats.
2020 has to be a drubbing for the GOP.
Conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin agrees. She says, "Trump and his enablers up and down the ticket must be defeated. . ." ⤵️
The GOP’s “twenty-five year march to the right was made possible by the hollowing of its organization center,” which “left the party vulnerable to takeover by extremists.”
They acknowledge that this is a “tall order,” but they give historical precedents: It can and has been done.
During our first few decades, we had the Federalists (the party of Alexander Hamilton) and the Democratic Republicans (the party of Thomas Jefferson.)
history.com/topics/early-u…
By 1828, the Federalist Party was dead.
The Democratic-Republicans basically stood alone until the rise of the Whigs (1835-1854)
If the GOP gets crushed in 2020, then
💠The GOP becomes a fringe extremist party, and a new center-right party is born* OR
💠The conservatives retake the GOP.
(*Yes, the Democrats can split)
For the past few decades, they counted on the fringe to get a majority.
Obviously you can’t appeal to non-white voters AND the KKK.
You have to pick.
In ⤵️Levitsky and Ziblatt offer historical precedents for the rebirth of a brand new center-right party, including the CDU in post WWII West Germany.
So what’s next for the GOP?
The future of the GOP isn’t looking good right now.
The Cook Political Report moved Collins Senate race to a tossup.
msn.com/en-us/news/pol…
The numbers don’t look good for the Trump-GOP.
beta.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/…
Remember 2016 when Trump was in love with polls? There was a reason. He knows how to read them.
As we move toward Nov. 2020 and Trump faces the prospect of a big loss. . .
He’ll up the ante on the racism, xenophobia, and hate.
The GOP knows that their electorate is aging and shrinking.
The right wing element of the GOP will view a potential loss in 2020 as a catastrophic existential threat.
There will be more defections.
cnn.com/2018/12/19/pol…
A major loss in 2020 will throw the GOP into crisis.
That’s why I don’t think anyone will get complacent when the polls show the GOP heading for defeat.
During the years it takes a new center-right party to find its legs, the Dems will in elections.
But first 2020 needs to be a landslide.
If you feel discouraged about the amount of work that needs to be done, think about Susan B. Anthony. . .
See:
I practice what I preach. I spent time this week as a volunteer updating a DNC election guide legal manual.
What are you doing? See my list: terikanefield-blog.com/things-to-do/
(spreading doubt and gloom doesn’t count)
Certainly as American conservatism came to be defined in the mid-20th century (a reaction to FDR, with the unifying goal of rolling back the New Deal) the conservatives could never achieve an electoral majority . . .
But conservatism as someone like @JonHaidt defines the mindset could achieve a majority.
Start reading here:
@JonHaidt gives (in my opinion) the best definition of liberal v. conservative, or left v. right.
In a nutshell, liberals are comfortable with change and new things.
Conservatives like the status quo . . .
Radicals look ahead to a better future and want to bring us to that future as quickly as possible . . .
Biology shows that conservatives and liberals have different brain types.
cell.com/current-biolog…
This Current Biology article. . .
The size of the amygdala correlates to increased fearfulness. Conservatives thus experience the world as a more fearful place, and are more fearful of rapid change.
I've written about. . .
I've noticed this: the far right tends to use the word "liberal" to mean "anyone who doesn't agree with us." Trump uses liberal to mean . . .
Those on the far left tend to use "center-right" to apply to anyone who wants incremental change instead of rapid change.
This is important from @karen_stenner: Three groups self-identify as 'conservative.' They are:
💠First, the group Stenner calls "status quo" conservatives (they don't like change). I tend to call them "traditional" or "true" conservatives, by which I mean they fit the psychological profile of conservatives.
💠Libertarians (I've had libertarians tell me . . .
💠Third, reactionaries indentify as conservative. I think they simply co-opted the word . . .
There's nothing conservative about reactionaries.
MAGA is a reactionary manifesto: let's go back to a bygone, better, more orderly era.
I think it's helpful to define terms . . .
On the contrary, for me, if people are mostly or somewhat born that way . . .
Those on the right side of the spectrum are afraid and fearful because their brains are wired differently.
This may be a horrible example, but here goes: My terrier is fearful. I've been able to lessen his fear of skateboards. . .
Current Biology is a respected journal. As I understand it, science pretty conclusively shows brain differences correleate to political difference.
Exactly. That's why I like Haidt's explanation of conservatives v liberals⤵️
Fear is a good thing. It keeps people from rushing into danger.
That's why I started by saying "American needs a center-right" party.
The point: America needs a center-right party.