, 4 tweets, 1 min read Read on Twitter
Bercow ruling that Queen's Consent is not required for the Benn bill.
This is important. Removes one of primary hopes of the government to block it.
To be clear Queen's Consent and Royal Assent are different things:

Queen's Consent: more esoteric, required when it's deemed legislation affects the royal preogative. Is occasionally denied.

Royal Assent: royal authorisation given at end of legislative process. Never denied.
If Johnson tries to deny Royal Assent (not done since the reign of Queen Anne) it would be unprecedented in the democratic era (indeed, before the democratic era) and unconstitutional. Oh and probably destroy the monarchy.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Lewis Goodall
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!