, 10 tweets, 3 min read Read on Twitter
THREAD: It’s been a decade since Fed traders jumped into U.S. money markets to inject cash and keep short-term interest rates (repo rate) from rising.

Confused? It's ok. Even traders were left scratching their heads.

Here’s exactly where things stand➡️bloom.bg/2lXlCSt
Before we start:

➡️Repo rate = Cost to borrow short-term cash (often overnight) in money markets, which is secured by collateral

➡️Money markets = Where traders can lend & borrow cash for short amounts of time. That’s different from the capital markets (bonds and stock markets)
On Tuesday, the NY Fed injected $53 billion into the money markets to push the repo rate down. Rates had spiked as high as 10%.

On Wednesday, after that repo rate started to move up again, the NY Fed injected $75 billion to the money markets bloom.bg/2lXXU8v
Why did the Fed have to step in and what drove rates up? We’re not 100% sure why but there are a few theories.

One is that there was a reduction in the supply of cash ready to be lent…the same time there was an increase in demand. That pushed prices up⬆️
Why was there so little cash on hand? 💸

The Treasury issued more bonds than people expected AND there was a big corporate tax payment on Monday.

That meant there was less money on hand to lend out in these active money markets

bloom.bg/2lXlCSt
Why is it a big deal that the repo rates spiked?

If left unchecked, the escalation in rates could do damage to the broader economy by hiking borrowing costs for companies and consumer 📉
Another note: Timing is bad because Fed leaders are at a policy meeting and are expected to cut the target rate by a quarter point.

The money-market problem threatens to overshadow the cut & Wall Street wants to know what Fed might do to fix the situation bloom.bg/2kjBBJU
The moves in the repo rate underscored just how deep the structural problems are.

There is often not enough cash on hand at Wall Street firms to meet the funding demands of a market trying to absorb record Treasury bond sales, which are needed to cover U.S. budget deficits
The solution? Longtime observers say the Fed would need to continue to inject cash on a regular basis.

Stay tuned for today’s Fed meeting and statement for more information--if they offer any.

Here's a bit more for context ➡️ bloom.bg/2lXXU8v
Follow @boes_ and @mccormickliz for more too!
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Bloomberg Economics
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!