A little thread inspired by this morning's @DailyMailUK front page, which suggests that the Palace is stoking hysteria about Harry and Meghan... 
@DailyMailUK We know the royal couple are sueing the Mail on Sunday. Which everyone in the Press deems "unwise". This little thread is just about the daily, not the Sunday, paper.
@DailyMailUK There's no doubt there are areas of the couple's life that deserve scrutiny - the private jets after the pronouncements about climate change, the expensive refurb - and of course there is interest in their son...
@DailyMailUK ... the Mail wants to coo over the baby - 23 straight pages on the day after he was born, with not a single pic available - and it feels miffed he's being kept away from the cameras.
But it's still found plenty to write about Meghan. Here's a selection from this year
But it's still found plenty to write about Meghan. Here's a selection from this year
@DailyMailUK She's been given advice on how to behave and where she's going wrong from Jan Moir, Sarah Vine, Libby Purves, Richard Kay, Stephen Glover, Patrick Jephson on everything from Wimbledon etiquette to her choice of feminist heroines
@DailyMailUK This year she has featured on the Mail's front page 28 times. Eight were out-and-out positive. The rest were critical or snide. She's even teased because Harry's wardrobe features a lot of grey. That is down to her, not him, of course.
@DailyMailUK Compare that with coverage of the sainted Kate. She appeared on the front 14 times. 100% positive.
Harry & Meg went on 10-day tour of Africa last month. Not one p1 pic.
Harry & Meg went on 10-day tour of Africa last month. Not one p1 pic.
@DailyMailUK Kate & Wills went to Pakistan this month. She was on the front on four successive days, topped of with a "stunning eight-page souvenir" of our Jewel of the East
@DailyMailUK This is just one paper. Think of all the column inches in the other tabs as well. So who is "stoking" this hysteria?
Have a nice day
Have a nice day
