"It's not an uncommon view among scientists that we potentially compromise our objectivity if we choose to wade into policy matters or societal implications of our work. And it would be problematic if our views on policy somehow influenced the way we went about doing our science"
"But there is nothing inappropriate at all about drawing on our scientific knowledge to speak out about the very real implications of our research."
"If scientists choose not to engage in the public debate, we leave a vacuum that will be filled by those whose agenda is one of short-term self-interest..."
"There is a great cost to society if scientists fail to participate in the larger conversation — if we do not do all we can to ensure that the policy debate is informed by an honest assessment of the risks."
'In fact, it would be an abrogation of our responsibility to society if we remained quiet in the face of such a grave threat."
"My colleague Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who died in 2010, used to say that being a scientist-advocate is not an oxymoron. Just because we are scientists does not mean that we should check our citizenship at the door of a public meeting, he would explain."
"The New Republic once called him a “scientific pugilist” for advocating a forceful approach to global warming.
But fighting for scientific truth and an informed debate is nothing to apologize for."
But fighting for scientific truth and an informed debate is nothing to apologize for."
"How will history judge us if we watch the threat unfold..but fail to communicate urgency of acting to avert potential disaster? How would I explain to future children of my 8-year-old daughter that grandfather saw the threat, but didn’t speak up in time?
Those are the stakes."
Those are the stakes."
