, 24 tweets, 15 min read Read on Twitter
I’m troubled by some very misleading statements and claims made at this public-facing @NOAA website on “Global Warming and Hurricanes”:
gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming…
(thread)
@NOAA Among the problems are indefensible claims about the supposed non-significance of trends in hurricane activity. This includes tropical cyclone and hurricane counts and the proportion of storms that reach the highest (cat 4 and 5) categories.
@NOAA These claims are based on fitting linear trends to the associated time series.

More than a decade ago, Kerry Emanuel and I showed (meteo.psu.edu/holocene/publi…) that this approach is problematic.
@NOAA It treats externally- forced multidecadal variability (from aerosols, volcanoes, etc.) as if it is simply internal multidecadal (“AMO”) variability.
@NOAA This artificial inflation of the amplitude of the putative internal variability artificially increases the apparent “noise”, thereby reducing the signal-to-noise ratio and yielding false inferences regarding statistical significance.
@NOAA A correct approach employs a statistical model that explicitly accounts for the total forced component of variability and then isolates the residual internal variability component.
@NOAA Doing so yields a highly significant statistical relationship between rising temperatures and measures of tropical cyclone activity.
@NOAA Using sound statistical methods, hurricane expert @JBElsner and collaborators have demonstrated a very clear, statistically-significant relationship between sea surface temperature and the intensity of the strongest storms (nature.com/articles/natur…).
@NOAA @JBElsner They find a roughly 7% increase in maximum hurricane intensity for each 1C increase in sea surface temperature. Since destructive potential goes as the 3rd power of maximum wind speed, that corresponds to a roughly 23% increase in destructive potential.
@NOAA @JBElsner The tropical North Atlantic has warmed by about 1C.
@NOAA @JBElsner The idea that an internal “AMO” variability component can simply be defined by the residual variability around a linear trend in SST time series has been shown to be erroneous now in numerous publications.
@NOAA @JBElsner And yet, frustratingly, the NOAA webpage in question (gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming…) is replete with results based on precisely such a procedure.
@NOAA @JBElsner Finally, the claim on that site that models show a decrease in the total number of tropical cyclones globally is wrong.
@NOAA @JBElsner Using a downscaling approach combined with state-of-the-art climate model simulations, leading researcher Kerry Emanuel finds an increase in both frequency and intensity for tropical cyclones globally, and in the North Atlantic specifically (pnas.org/content/110/30…).
@NOAA @JBElsner The modeling approach used by the GFDL group is the primary basis for the claim of a decrease in frequency. Many of us long suspected that was an artifact of too-low model resolution, which fails to resolve the eye wall dynamics of storms.
@NOAA @JBElsner Indeed, these researchers have recently conceded that the decrease in frequency evaporates when adequate model resolution is used:
@NOAA @JBElsner Using a downscaling approach combined with state-of-the-art climate model simulations, leading researcher Kerry Emanuel finds an increase in both frequency and intensity for tropical cyclones globally, and in the North Atlantic specifically (pnas.org/content/110/30…).
@NOAA @JBElsner The modeling approach used by the GFDL group is the primary basis for the claim of a decrease in frequency. Many of us long suspected that was an artifact of too-low model resolution, which fails to resolve the eye wall dynamics of storms.
@NOAA @JBElsner Indeed, these researchers have recently conceded that the decrease in frequency evaporates when adequate model resolution is used:
@NOAA @JBElsner The idea that an internal “AMO” variability component can simply be defined by the residual variability around a linear trend in SST time series has been shown to be erroneous now in numerous publications:
@NOAA Unsurprisingly, disinformers who have been exploiting this misinformation are upset I've drawn attention to it:
Ryan Maue (desmog.co.uk/2017/08/14/cli…)
Judith Curry (sourcewatch.org/index.php/Judi…)
Roger Pielke Jr (huffpost.com/entry/fivethir…)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Michael E. Mann
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!