Chuck please offer even one major-media article—not an editorial, a *report*—accusing the Trump campaign of "taking part in" Russian hacking before- or during-the-fact
No one reported that
The only ones who discuss it are radicals like you who claim liberals said it
We didn't
No one reported that
The only ones who discuss it are radicals like you who claim liberals said it
We didn't
By the same token, @ChuckRossDC, please explain how Trump *literally disseminating stolen WikiLeaks intel* at dozens of rallies in September/October 2016—and his team retweeting it madly on Twitter—*isn't* "evidence the Trump team took part in dissemination" of WikiLeaks content
@ChuckRossDC This is what I mean about media wrongly referring to far-right slanders as a "case." There's no "case" in any way lawyers or researchers would understand it, there's just nonsensical denials punctuated by outrageous slanders. That's it. That's the whole of the "defense" of Trump.
@ChuckRossDC And @ChuckRossDC, if you don't have the *courage* to Google the federal bribery statute to see that Trump's solicitation of bribes from Ukrainians falls *squarely* into what that statute sends people to prison for and what the Constitution enumerates as impeachable, quit your job
