I know, as do most mediates who cover this, Elise Stefanik took these allegations seriously and considered the evidence. I even criticized her if you remember, joking she did B/C of her district.
In any other time period, historically, her opposition would've ended this charade.
In any other time period, historically, her opposition would've ended this charade.
But in this time period, fact patterns don't matter and the implications of precedent in a common law system are secondary concerns to power.
In this period, people need to be told that "impeachment" does not equal removal from office.
In this period, people need to be told that "impeachment" does not equal removal from office.
What it does equal is a horrible precedent that permanently damages the Office of the Presidency and our very social contract.
Opinions of the moderate, measured voices like @EliseStefanik are marginalized to support a partisan, illogical narrative.
That's sad for our children.
Opinions of the moderate, measured voices like @EliseStefanik are marginalized to support a partisan, illogical narrative.
That's sad for our children.
@EliseStefanik So, please cornballs, park your "Orange Man Bad" pathetic tweets. None of this is about Donald Trump.
It's about the country we leave our children, which will be in tatters and lawlessness. Common law is about precedent.
Putting hyperpartisanship above law is acceptable now.
It's about the country we leave our children, which will be in tatters and lawlessness. Common law is about precedent.
Putting hyperpartisanship above law is acceptable now.
