* it's a job/skill next to your work as professor
* Pitching to media is a people business. You don't pitch to "the media" - you pitch to different audiences etc. know your audience
* idea needs to be well-crafted. Otherwise, time-sink and not worth time investment
Pitching is all good, but you need to be found. Have your own website. Have a place where you can say what you do. Different ways to be visible - don't let media look through pages of miserable university pages.
Also, write what you know - lots of legwork in pitching
If you pitch to media and don't hear from them - remind them politely.
When you respond, feel free to be forthright.
Feel free to say no if you can't do it. Even better if you can point them to someone else who can (a colleague)--good for maintaining relations!
Don't have thin skin, where you take it personally.
Rejection = well, I have a day job. I tried. Don't feel bad.
It's not for everyone to be a public scholar.
The Editor is in position of power.
This leads to the next panel question: How do I build relationships? #aarsbl19
@Medium is good to push your own stuff there but you already need some traction on social media.
* don't wait too long if time-sensitive #aarsbl19
* don't have fully written piece yet, just one clean paragraph
* say sth about longevity of your piece in pitch
* know the venue you're pitching for
* Don't pitch to several news outlets at the same time. Why? You might disappoint editor and that's bad for relationship.
* Say something like if I don't hear from you by x, I'll pitch it somewhere else (and do that!)
Editors are busy!
@bobsmietana says: hey cool a math formula that can tell me if someone's lying. But I don't understand it. He has limited time.
Credentials. Context. Importance and current relevance. Personal interest/enthusiasm matters enormously
Los Angeles Review of Books
Aeon
Guernica Magazine
Medium
- you can realistically do 2000 words or so in these.
You choose where you publish.