, 9 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Part of the art and science of customer support is understanding how you can lose money on *every* transaction that customer support gets involved with and still have things work out for you at scale... contingent on *very* successful execution both inside and outside of CS.
Human attention is much more expensive than people expect.

People expect human attention immediately if they ever need it.

People think human attention is built into your price.

These are not easy constraints to satisfy, but they are satisfiable at least some of the time.
An example of this: no single transaction involving a retail customer below approximately a mortgage would have positive contribution to a bank's bottom line if a person talked to you about it.
The bank doesn't employ people so you can talk to them. The bank employs people so that you use that bank when you *don't* need to talk to anyone.
A useful number to keep in your head, from a US-based call center a long time ago: seven dollars. Seven dollars is the cost of picking up the phone.

(I earned $10.25 an hour, and was confused as to how that math works, and was told "overhead." It took years before I understood.)
$7 blows away all the contribution margin from a $N million domestic wire, about a $500 to $1k credit card transaction (for the issuer), a middle class American's primary banking relationship for about a month or so, a month of B2C SaaS, etc etc etc.
Note that $7 is *very much not* the top end of e.g. "How much does it cost to respond to a ticket given that the ticket will be touched by e.g. a San Francisco-based engineer multiple times?"
Anyhow:

Hug your customer support professionals close.

Understand that this is the math dictating why it is difficult to get a human on the first ring in many places.

Understand that most places with sucky CS didn't say "Strategy memo: humans, who cares what they think."
Second thoughts brain: "I mean banks sell a lot of things, right. Auto loans, HELOCs, wealth management products, some specialty derivatives to retail..."

Third brain: "OK OK technically inaccurate."

Second brain: "Which means INACCURATE."
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Patrick McKenzie

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!